Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NEW ENGLAND PLASTICS CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NEW ENGLAND PLASTICS CORPORATION in 126 DUCHAINE BOULEVARD, NEW BEDFORD, MA 02745 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 341141364.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch NEW England Plastics Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for NEW England Plastics Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
126 DUCHAINE BOULEVARD
City
NEW BEDFORD
State
MA
ZIP
02745
Mailing
126 DUCHAINE BOULEVARD, NEW BEDFORD, MA 02745
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
78
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2016
Abate by
Apr 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200

Hazardous substances 8110

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  Location: Facility  Employees are exposed to noise levels above an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or a dose of 50 percent, and the employer had not developed and administered a Hearing Conservation Program that includes:  1) Annual Audiograms 2) Annual training 3) Periodic monitoring 4) Fit testing of hearing protection devices  Noise Measurements:  Drum Lining:  8-hr TWA 88.8 dBA (85.0% dose) Thermoforming: 8-hr TWA 90.9 dBA (111.9% dose) Grinding: 8-hr TWA 87.3 dBA (69.5% dose) Press: 8-hr TWA 90.7 dBA (110.5% dose)
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2016
Abate by
Apr 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800

Hazardous substances 0010011012901310

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation  Location: Worksite  Employees are exposed to particles and irritant vapors when heating and melting polyethylene products (Marlex HXM 50100 Polyethylene and Dow Polyethylyne 1321), and they were not wearing eye protection for the chemical vapors that were generated by the process.   Appropriate eye protection is safety glasses with eye shields or goggles.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2016
Abate by
Apr 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 001001101290

29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees hands were exposed to hazardous condition.  Location: Facility  Employees are exposed to thermal burns when working with melted Marlex HXM 50100 Polyethylene and Dow Polyethylene 1321 pellets, and they were not wearing proper gloves.  Appropriate hand protection is thermal gloves
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2016
Abate by
Apr 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800

Hazardous substances 00100020004001101290

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:   Location: Extrusion and Thermoforming Areas  The employer has not conducted an evaluation of the respiratory hazards where polyethylene pellets are heated, and vapors, such as, but not limited to, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acetone, and acrolein are generated by thermal decomposition.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2016
Abate by
Apr 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  Location: Facility  Employees were operating forklifts, and their performance had not been reevaluated every 3 years.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Feb 25, 2016
Abate by
Apr 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800

Hazardous substances 1290

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met  Location: Worksite  A written hazard communication program had not been developed and implemented where polyethylene resin pellets were melted, which can generate toxic vapors, including:      1) Dow Polyethylene 1321: Aldehydes, alcohols, organic acids, and hydrocarbons     2) Marlex HXM 50100 Polyethylene:  Acetaldehyde, acetone, acetic acid, formic acid, formaldehyde, acrolein  ABATEMENT NOTE:  A written program shall include description of how the criteria for the following will be met:      1.  Labeling and other forms of warning;     2.  Material Safety Data Sheets;     3.  Employee information and training  Additionally, a list of hazardous chemicals known to be present in the workplace must be compiled.  Methods used to inform employees of the hazards associated with non-routine tasks and the informing of contractors of workplace hazards, including a description of the labeling system used in the facility and of the availability of material safety data sheets, must also be addressed.  The written program must be made available upon request.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

View NEW England Plastics Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341141364.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.