NEW BEDFORD, MA —
OSHA Inspection: NEW ENGLAND PLASTICS CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NEW ENGLAND PLASTICS CORPORATION in 126 DUCHAINE BOULEVARD, NEW BEDFORD, MA 02745 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 341141364.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NEW ENGLAND PLASTICS CORPORATION
- Site address
- 126 DUCHAINE BOULEVARD
- City
- NEW BEDFORD
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02745
- Mailing
- 126 DUCHAINE BOULEVARD, NEW BEDFORD, MA 02745
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326199
- Employees
- 78
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Feb 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
8110
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: Location: Facility Employees are exposed to noise levels above an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or a dose of 50 percent, and the employer had not developed and administered a Hearing Conservation Program that includes: 1) Annual Audiograms 2) Annual training 3) Periodic monitoring 4) Fit testing of hearing protection devices Noise Measurements: Drum Lining: 8-hr TWA 88.8 dBA (85.0% dose) Thermoforming: 8-hr TWA 90.9 dBA (111.9% dose) Grinding: 8-hr TWA 87.3 dBA (69.5% dose) Press: 8-hr TWA 90.7 dBA (110.5% dose)
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Feb 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
0010011012901310
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation Location: Worksite Employees are exposed to particles and irritant vapors when heating and melting polyethylene products (Marlex HXM 50100 Polyethylene and Dow Polyethylyne 1321), and they were not wearing eye protection for the chemical vapors that were generated by the process. Appropriate eye protection is safety glasses with eye shields or goggles.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Feb 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
001001101290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees hands were exposed to hazardous condition. Location: Facility Employees are exposed to thermal burns when working with melted Marlex HXM 50100 Polyethylene and Dow Polyethylene 1321 pellets, and they were not wearing proper gloves. Appropriate hand protection is thermal gloves
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Feb 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
00100020004001101290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: Location: Extrusion and Thermoforming Areas The employer has not conducted an evaluation of the respiratory hazards where polyethylene pellets are heated, and vapors, such as, but not limited to, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acetone, and acrolein are generated by thermal decomposition.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Feb 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: Location: Facility Employees were operating forklifts, and their performance had not been reevaluated every 3 years.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met Location: Worksite A written hazard communication program had not been developed and implemented where polyethylene resin pellets were melted, which can generate toxic vapors, including: 1) Dow Polyethylene 1321: Aldehydes, alcohols, organic acids, and hydrocarbons 2) Marlex HXM 50100 Polyethylene: Acetaldehyde, acetone, acetic acid, formic acid, formaldehyde, acrolein ABATEMENT NOTE: A written program shall include description of how the criteria for the following will be met: 1. Labeling and other forms of warning; 2. Material Safety Data Sheets; 3. Employee information and training Additionally, a list of hazardous chemicals known to be present in the workplace must be compiled. Methods used to inform employees of the hazards associated with non-routine tasks and the informing of contractors of workplace hazards, including a description of the labeling system used in the facility and of the availability of material safety data sheets, must also be addressed. The written program must be made available upon request.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at NEW England Plastics Corporation
View NEW England Plastics Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326199)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341141364.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.