Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: SECOND NATURE TREE SERVICE

Fatality or catastrophe inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a fatality or catastrophe safety inspection of SECOND NATURE TREE SERVICE in 529 SOUTH CLARY ROAD, JEFFERSON, ME 04348 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 341141679.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Second Nature Tree Service for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Second Nature Tree Service is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
529 SOUTH CLARY ROAD
City
JEFFERSON
State
ME
ZIP
04348
Mailing
55 GRAND ARMY RD, WHITEFIELD, ME 04353
Inspection type
Fatality or catastrophe (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561730
Employees
1
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2016
Abate by
Jun 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to the hazards of falling or rolling tree limb(s):    Private Residence - On or about December 23, 2015, an employee was struck and killed by a tree limb that was cut by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.135 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2016
Abate by
Jun 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee wear a protective helmet when working in areas where there is a potential for injury to the head from falling objects:  Private Residence- On or about December 23, 2015, an employee was not wearing a protective helmet when he was struck and killed by a falling tree limb.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2016
Abate by
Aug 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer did not develop, implement, or maintain at the workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:    Private Residence - The employer did not develop, implement or maintain a hazard communications program for such hazardous materials as gasoline, engine oil and bar/chain oil.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2016
Abate by
Aug 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    Private Residence - The employer did not have a written certification verifying that a hazard assessment of the workplace had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.133 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2016
Abate by
Jun 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective face equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:  Private Residence - On or about December 22, 2015, the employee loading limbs and/or branches into the chipper was not wearing a face shield or screen.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341141679.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.