Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ORLEAN COMPANY

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ORLEAN COMPANY in 22710 LAKE ROAD, ROCKY RIVER, OH 44116 (NAICS 531311). OSHA activity number 341146470.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Orlean Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Orlean Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ORLEAN COMPANY
Site address
22710 LAKE ROAD
City
ROCKY RIVER
State
OH
ZIP
44116
Mailing
23875 COMMERCE PARK RD, BEACHWOOD, OH 44122
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
531311
Employees
250
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    On or about December 30, 2015, the employer had not documented that a workplace hazard assessment had been conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.213 R04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $4,095 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(r)(4): Suitable guard(s) were not provided to reduce to a minimum the hazard due to the point of operation of:    On or about December 30, 2015, the employer failed to guard the point of operation, on the lower  portion of the saw blade located on the miter/chop in the maintenance workshop. Employees  used the saw for cutting wood needed for the senior apartments and common areas of the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4095
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    On or about December 30, 2015, the employer failed to develop a written Exposure Control Plan for employees that are housekeepers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1620
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.1030 F02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i): Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available within 10 working days of initial assignment to all employee(s) with occupational exposure:  On or about December 30,2015, the employer failed to offer hepatitis B vaccines to employees that are housekeepers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(iv): Annual training for employees with occupational exposure was not provided within one year of their previous training:  On or about December 30, 2015, the employer failed to have employees that are housekeepers, trained annually.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):    On or about December 30, 2015, the employer did not provide a written hazardous communication program to employees who perform housekeeping cleaning operations and maintenance operations, utilizing chemicals including, but not limited to, bleach, ammonia, oven cleaner, drain cleaner, and coil cleaner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use  On or about December 30, 2015, the employer did not ensure that safety data sheets were readily accessible during each work shift in that employees did not know where the SDS's were located.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about December 30, 2015, employees working with or around hazardous chemicals including but not limited to glass cleaner, bleach, ammonia, oven cleaner, clobber drain cleaner, tile cleaner, grout cleaner, coil cleaner, were not provided with information or training on the hazards of the cleaners and chemicals they work with.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 58 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $450 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent.    Abatement Certification and Documentation is required    a) On or about December 30, 2015, the employer did not keep a log for each recordable work related injury/illness for the calendar year 2015 in accordance with the record keeping requirements.    b) On or about December 30, 2015, the employer did not keep a log for each recordable work related injury/illness for the calendar year 2016 in accordance with the record keeping requirements.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $450
  • — Z (O) $900

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 22, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,925 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): Basic Requirement. Within twenty-four (24) hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, you must report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye to OSHA.    On or about December 30, 2015, the employer did not report an employee amputation, that occurred on September 10, 2015 at The Normandy Apartments, within the required twenty four hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2925
  • — Z (O) $4500

View Orlean Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341146470.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.