ROCKY RIVER, OH —
OSHA Inspection: ORLEAN COMPANY
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ORLEAN COMPANY in 22710 LAKE ROAD, ROCKY RIVER, OH 44116 (NAICS 531311). OSHA activity number 341146470.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ORLEAN COMPANY
- Site address
- 22710 LAKE ROAD
- City
- ROCKY RIVER
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44116
- Mailing
- 23875 COMMERCE PARK RD, BEACHWOOD, OH 44122
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 531311
- Employees
- 250
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Feb 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: On or about December 30, 2015, the employer had not documented that a workplace hazard assessment had been conducted.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1800
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.213 R04
- Issued
- Feb 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $4,095 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(r)(4): Suitable guard(s) were not provided to reduce to a minimum the hazard due to the point of operation of: On or about December 30, 2015, the employer failed to guard the point of operation, on the lower portion of the saw blade located on the miter/chop in the maintenance workshop. Employees used the saw for cutting wood needed for the senior apartments and common areas of the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4095
- — Z (S) $6300
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Feb 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: On or about December 30, 2015, the employer failed to develop a written Exposure Control Plan for employees that are housekeepers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1620
- — Z (S) $2700
1910.1030 F02 I
- Issued
- Feb 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(i): Hepatitis B vaccination was not made available within 10 working days of initial assignment to all employee(s) with occupational exposure: On or about December 30,2015, the employer failed to offer hepatitis B vaccines to employees that are housekeepers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 IV
- Issued
- Feb 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(iv): Annual training for employees with occupational exposure was not provided within one year of their previous training: On or about December 30, 2015, the employer failed to have employees that are housekeepers, trained annually.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): On or about December 30, 2015, the employer did not provide a written hazardous communication program to employees who perform housekeeping cleaning operations and maintenance operations, utilizing chemicals including, but not limited to, bleach, ammonia, oven cleaner, drain cleaner, and coil cleaner.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2250
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Feb 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use On or about December 30, 2015, the employer did not ensure that safety data sheets were readily accessible during each work shift in that employees did not know where the SDS's were located.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Feb 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about December 30, 2015, employees working with or around hazardous chemicals including but not limited to glass cleaner, bleach, ammonia, oven cleaner, clobber drain cleaner, tile cleaner, grout cleaner, coil cleaner, were not provided with information or training on the hazards of the cleaners and chemicals they work with.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.29 A
- Issued
- Feb 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent. Abatement Certification and Documentation is required a) On or about December 30, 2015, the employer did not keep a log for each recordable work related injury/illness for the calendar year 2015 in accordance with the record keeping requirements. b) On or about December 30, 2015, the employer did not keep a log for each recordable work related injury/illness for the calendar year 2016 in accordance with the record keeping requirements.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $450
- — Z (O) $900
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Feb 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,925 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): Basic Requirement. Within twenty-four (24) hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, you must report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye to OSHA. On or about December 30, 2015, the employer did not report an employee amputation, that occurred on September 10, 2015 at The Normandy Apartments, within the required twenty four hours.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2925
- — Z (O) $4500
More inspections at Orlean Company
View Orlean Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 531311)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341146470.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.