Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ARUNDEL MACHINE TOOL, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARUNDEL MACHINE TOOL, INC. in 20 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, ARUNDEL, ME 04046 (NAICS 332721). OSHA activity number 341147114.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Arundel Machine Tool, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Arundel Machine Tool, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
20 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE
City
ARUNDEL
State
ME
ZIP
04046
Mailing
20 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, ARUNDEL, ME 04046
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332721
Employees
77
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.179 J03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
Apr 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): Complete inspections of the crane was not being performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section:  Shipping and Receiving Department - A Periodic Inspection of the 2 ton Budget Hoist overhead crane was not conducted at one to twelve month intervals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.179 J02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
Apr 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iii): Monthly inspections of hooks, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the hook inspected, were not performed:  Shipping and Receiving - A monthly inspection with certification record of the 2 ton Budget Hoist hook was not performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 J02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
Apr 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv): Monthly inspections of hoist chains, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier of the chain which was inspected, were not performed:  Shipping and Receiving - A monthly inspection with certification record of the 2 ton Budget Hoist chain was not performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
Apr 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 pounds per square inch:  In the following locations compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to a static pressure of less than 30 psi: a)  Grinding Room, Surface Grinder - The air relief holes of the safety nozzle were taped, rendering the safety nozzle ineffective. b)   CNC Turning, Yang ML 15A - The compressed air nozzle did not have features to reduce the static pressure to less than 30 psi, nor was the line pressure reduced to less than 30 psi. c)  CNC Turning, Okuma and Howa HL-20 - The compressed air nozzle did not have features to reduce the static pressure to less than 30 psi, nor was the line pressure reduced to less than 30 psi.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
Apr 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met, and which also includes a list of hazardous chemicals known to be present in the workplace:  Establishment - The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 F05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
Apr 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:   Manual Machining and Finishing - A spray bottle containing liquid and labeled Spirit 126 was not marked with the hazard warnings.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
Apr 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2) and (h)(3) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:  Establishment - Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.33 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 77 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
Apr 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.33(a): 29 CFR 1904.33(a): The employer did not maintain the OSHA 300 log, the privacy case list, the annual summary  and the OSHA 301 Inident Report forms for five (5) years following the end of the calendar year that those records covered:  Establishment - The employer did not maintain the Annual Summary, OSHA 300A, for the years 2011, 2012, and 2013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $350
  • — Z (O) $700

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 77 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2016
Abate by
Apr 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:  In the following locations a fire extinguisher sign was not provided at the portable fire extinguisher location: a)  Main Entrance  b)  CNC Turning, Outside Women's Restroom c)  Shipping & Receiving, West Wall, Adjacent to Overhead Door d)  Grinding Room
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Arundel Machine Tool, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341147114.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.