FORT LUPTON, CO —
OSHA Inspection: MILLS SOLIDS CONTROL CONSULTING
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MILLS SOLIDS CONTROL CONSULTING in AGGREGATE STATE /37C-16HZ, FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 341155380.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MILLS SOLIDS CONTROL CONSULTING
- Site address
- AGGREGATE STATE /37C-16HZ
- City
- FORT LUPTON
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80621
- Mailing
- 113 6TH AVENUE, GREELEY, CO 80631
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 213112
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 E06 I
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,067 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(i): Adequate precautions were not taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors: (a) Mills Solids Control Consulting @ Aggregate State /37C-16HZ, Fort Lupton, CO: On and prior to 12/13/2015, the employer had not ensured precautions were taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors. On 12/13/2015, an employee was seriously burned while using an open flame propane weed burner to thaw a frozen Fisher brand liquid transfer pump. The open flame weed burner ignited hydrocarbon vapors emanating from the hazardous product inside a three-sided container with high walls measuring approximately 15 feet wide x 30 feet long X 8 feet high.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4067
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.132 F01 III
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1)(iii): Employees required to use PPE by this section were not trained to know how to don, doff, adjust, and wear PPE: (a) Mills Solids Control Consulting @ Aggregate State /37C-16HZ, Fort Lupton, CO: On and prior to 12/13/2015, the employer had not provided appropriate training for employees required to wear flame-resistant (FR) clothing to mitigate injury from exposure to a flash fire. An employee was wearing FR clothing with the shirttail untucked from the pants, with the sleeves partially rolled up, and with the collar open and unsecured. Condition exposed employee to burn hazards. This employee received 2nd and 3rd degree burns to the torso from a flash fire while using an open flame propane weed burner to thaw a frozen Fisher brand liquid transfer pump.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,976 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to corrosive liquid materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and/or body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: (a) Mills Solids Control Consulting @ Aggregate State /37C-16HZ, Fort Lupton, CO: On and before 12/13/2015, Mills Solids Control Consulting did not ensure that where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and/or body were provided within the work area for immediate emergency use. Employees used a chemical product with a pH of 2 (CWP99), while working inside the water treatment trailer. This condition exposed employees to a chemical burn hazard. Abatement Note: For details on minimum requirements for a suitable emergency eyewash and shower equipment, OSHA references the American National Standard for Emergency Eyewash and Shower Equipment, ANSI Z358.1
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1976
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $2,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8) The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical: (a) Mills Solids Control Consulting @ Aggregate State /37C-16HZ, Fort Lupton, CO: On and prior to 12/14/2015, the employer did not maintain safety data sheets (SDS) at the worksite for the hazardous chemicals used inside the container with high walls. On 12/13/2015, an employee was seriously burned after hydrocarbon vapors ignited.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2470
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: (a) Mills Solids Control Consulting @ Aggregate State /37C-16HZ, Fort Lupton, CO: On and before 12/13/2015, the employer did not ensure that the container with high walls, used for storing liquid product collected from various oil/gas well sties, was labeled, tagged, or marked to provide specific information regarding the physical and health hazards associated with the hazardous chemicals. On 12/13/2015 an employee was seriously burned after hydrocarbon vapors ignited inside the container with high walls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,178 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training pertaining to hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) Mills Solids Control Consulting @ Aggregate State /37C-16HZ, Fort Lupton, CO: The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training to recognize the hazard of using an open flame propane weed burner in close proximity to a flammable product. On 12/13/2015, an employee was seriously burned while using an open flame propane weed burner to thaw a frozen Fisher brand liquid transfer pump. The open flame weed burner ignited hydrocarbon vapors emanating from the hazardous product inside the container with high walls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4178
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.1200 H03 I
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i): The employee training did not include the methods and observations used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in the work area: (a) Mills Solids Control Consulting @ Aggregate State /37C-16HZ, Fort Lupton, CO: 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i): On and prior to 12/13/2015, the employer did not adequately train employees to utilize methods and or observations to identify the presence of hydrocarbons inside the container with high walls. Employees were not trained to utilize devices such as 4 gas monitors for the detection of hydrocarbons prior to using an open flame propane weed burner to thaw a frozen Fisher brand liquid transfer pump. An employee received 2nd and 3rd degree burns after flammable vapors ignited inside the container with high walls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 H01
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(h)(1): Personal protective equipment (PPE), was not provided by the employer at no cost to employees. (a) Mills Solids Control Consulting @ Aggregate State /37C-16HZ, Fort Lupton, CO: On and prior to 12/13/2015, the employer had not provided personal protective equipment including but not limited to flame-resistant (FR) clothing and hard hats to employees at no cost to employees. The FR clothing used when the flash fire occurred on 12/13/2015 was purchased by the employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 213112)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341155380.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.