BROOKFIELD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: THE TILE SHOP
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of THE TILE SHOP in 18 FEDERAL ROAD, BROOKFIELD, CT 06804 (NAICS 444190). OSHA activity number 341156974.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE TILE SHOP
- Site address
- 18 FEDERAL ROAD
- City
- BROOKFIELD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06804
- Mailing
- 18 FEDERAL ROAD, BROOKFIELD, CT 06804
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 444190
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2016
- Abate by
- May 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): Facility: A workplace hazard assessment to determine hazards present or likely to be present in order to necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) was not conducted.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2016
- Abate by
- May 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: Facility: A workplace hazard assessment with written certification was not completed/performed.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $3500
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2016
- Abate by
- May 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): Warehouse: Each powered industrial truck operator did not successfully complete a powered industrial truck training program and evaluation.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.178 N08
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2016
- Abate by
- May 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(n)(8): Under all travel conditions the truck was not operated at a speed that would permit it to be brought to a stop in a safe manner. Warehouse: Powered industrial trucks utilizing the outside metal loading ramp required operating the powered industrial truck at above normal speeds in order to ascend up the ramp in order to enter the building.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $4000
- — Z (S) $4000
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2016
- Abate by
- May 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s): Warehouse: The Nissan powered industrial truck used to unload and load items via an outside loading ramp was equipped with tires that did not have proper tread for indoor and outdoor use and was not taken out of service until the tires had been replaced.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2016
- Abate by
- May 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Facility: A written hazard communication program was not developed and implemented for products and chemicals such as but not limited to propane and grout.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2016
- Abate by
- May 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Facility: Each employee working with products and chemicals such as but not limited to propane and grout were not provided with information and training on the hazardous chemicals found in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $3500
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at The Tile Shop
View The Tile Shop's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 444190)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341156974.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.