Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BORBET ALABAMA, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of BORBET ALABAMA, INC. in 979 WEST VETERANS BLVD, AUBURN, AL 36832 (NAICS 336390). OSHA activity number 341159986.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Borbet Alabama, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Borbet Alabama, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
979 WEST VETERANS BLVD
City
AUBURN
State
AL
ZIP
36832
Mailing
979 WEST VETERANS BLVD, AUBURN, AL 36832
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336390
Employees
413
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2016
Abate by
Jul 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:    a) GIMA machines in the Foundry area: On or about January 4, 2016 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure a fall protection method was used while working on top of the machine which exposed employees to falls up to 12-feet.    b) IMT 4 Axis machines in the Machining area: On or about January 4, 2016 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure a fall protection method was used while working on top of the machine which exposed employees to a fall of 9-feet.      c) Upper Conveyor in the Machining area: On or about January 4, 2016 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure a fall protection method was used while working along conveyor which exposed employees to a fall of 26-feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2016
Abate by
Jul 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $3,825
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:     a) GIMA Machines: On or about January 4, 2016, the employer did not ensure Die Maintenance employees were trained on lockout requirements while conducting servicing related activities which exposed employees to amputations and other injures associated with being crushed-by moving machinery.      b) Robotic Cells: On or about January 4, 2016, the employer did not ensure Production Tech employees were trained on lockout requirements while conduct repair and/or servicing related activities in these cells which exposed employees to amputations and other injures associated with being crushed-by and struck-by moving machinery.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3825
  • — Z (S) $3825

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2016
Abate by
Jul 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $3,825
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees:    a) GIMA Machines: On or about January 4, 2016, the employer did not ensure authorized employees affixed personal lockout devices while conducting die change-out related activities from the maintenance platform behind the machine which exposed employees to amputations and other injures associated with being crushed-by moving machinery.      b) Robotic Cells: On or about January 4, 2016, the employer did not ensure authorized employees affixed personal lockout devices while conducting alignment related activities inside the cells which exposed employees to amputations and other injures associated with being crushed-by and struck-by moving machinery.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3825
  • — Z (S) $3825

View Borbet Alabama, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341159986.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.