OAKLAND, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: DAVIDS STUCCO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAVIDS STUCCO in 124 YAWPO AVE, OAKLAND, NJ 07436 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341164457.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAVIDS STUCCO
- Site address
- 124 YAWPO AVE
- City
- OAKLAND
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07436
- Mailing
- 4607 LIBERTY AVE APT-1, NORTH BERGEN, NJ 07047
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolding was not fully planked or decked: a- Residential Exterior: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12 ft to the ground below as the scaffold platform consisted of only 2 & 3 planks as full planking was not utilized. Condition noted on or about 01/07/2016.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: A- Residential Exterior: Employees were exposed to scaffold collapse as scaffold supporting legs were not provided a firm foundation. Condition noted on or about 01/07/2016
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Cross braces were used as a means of access. a-Residential Exterior: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12ft to the ground below as a means of scaffold access and egress was not utilized. Condition noted on or about 01/07/2016
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 F06
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6).Note: Specify distances as indicated in table in paragraph (f)(6) of this section. a-Exterior Structure: Employees were exposed to electrocution hazards when engaged in stucco work while working from a scaffold work platform within 12 inches of an energized secondary power source. Condition noted on or about 01/07/2016
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection. a-Residential Exterior: Employees engaged in stucco work were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12ft to the ground below as a means of fall protection was not utilized. Condition noted on or about 01/07/2016
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at Davids Stucco
View Davids Stucco's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341164457.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.