Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VECTOR MAGNETICS LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VECTOR MAGNETICS LLC in 236 CHERRY STREET, ITHACA, NY 14850 (NAICS 334519). OSHA activity number 341168169.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vector Magnetics LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vector Magnetics LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
236 CHERRY STREET
City
ITHACA
State
NY
ZIP
14850
Mailing
236 CHERRY STREET, ITHACA, NY 14850
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
334519
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Feb 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:    a)  Vector Magnetics LLC, on or about 1/6/16:  The employer did not provide fire extinguisher use training to employees upon initial employment and annually thereafter.         * ABATEMENT NOTE:  By this date the employer must either correct the alleged violation or implement a Fire Safety Policy; as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and .39(a) which includes the evacuation requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(b).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $816
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,040 · Current $1,224 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a)  Shop, on or about 1/6/16:  Cincinnati drill press was not equipped with a guard to cover the rotating chuck and serrated cutting tool.    b)  Shop, on or about 1/6/16:  Powermatic drill press was not equipped with a guard to cover the rotating chuck and serrated cutting tool.    c)  Shop, on or about 1/6/16:  Sunex Tools drill press was not equipped with a guard to cover the rotating chuck and serrated cutting tool.    d)  Shop, on or about 1/6/16:  Clausing Lathe 13-inch was not equipped with a guard to cover the rotating chuck.    e)  Shop, on or about 1/6/16:  MSC Lathe, Model 951446, was not equipped with a guard to cover the rotating chuck.    f)  Shop, on or about 1/6/16:  TRAK DPM3 milling machine was not equipped with a guard to cover the rotating chuck and serrated cutting tool.    g)  Shop, on or about 1/6/16:  Honeoye milling machine was not equipped with a guard to cover the rotating chuck and serrated cutting tool.     h)  Shop, on or about 1/6/16:  Central Machinery buffing machine was not equipped with guards over the rotating shafts and end nut projections.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1224
  • — Z (S) $2040

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Feb 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:    a)  Laser area, on or about 1/6/16:  Flexible cord was used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of an exhaust fan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Feb 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  a)  Laser Area, on or about 1/6/16:  Flexible cords connected to a metal switch box were not provided with strain relief in that both cords were pulled from the metal box.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1026 D02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Mar 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $612 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(i): The employer using the scheduled monitoring option did not perform initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure to chromium (VI) for each employee on the basis of a sufficient number of personal breathing zone air samples to accurately characterize full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area     a)  Vector Magnetics LLC, on or about 1/6/16:  The Employer did not conduct initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure to chromium (VI) for employees who perform welding operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $612
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Feb 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  a)  Shop, on or about 1/6/16: The employer did not provide the information contained in Appendix D of the respirator standard to employees who wear 3M half-mask respirators voluntarily.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2016
Abate by
Feb 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:   a)  Shop, on or about 1/6/16:  Where employees are voluntarily wearing 3M half-mask respirators while spray painting and welding, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341168169.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.