OSHA Inspection: ORCHARD SHELL SERVICE, LLC

Issued

May 26, 2016

Abate by

Jul 22, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.38(b): The employer with less than 10 employees did not have an emergency action plan, either written or oral, with procedures for employees to follow in case of a fire or other emergency.    For the convenience and maintenance shop, the employer did not have an emergency action plan, either in written form or oral, with procedures for employees to follow in case of a fire or other emergency.

Issued

May 26, 2016

Abate by

Jun 22, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:  A portable fire extinguisher located in the maintenance shop was not subjected to an annual maintenance check.

Issued

May 26, 2016

Abate by

Sep 22, 2016

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    In the maintenance shop, the employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met for employees exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to: tire sealant, engine oil, and coolant.

Issued

May 26, 2016

Abate by

Sep 22, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical    In the maintenance shop, the employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to tire sealant, engine oil and coolant for employees exposed to chemicals when performing maintenance on automobiles.

Issued

May 26, 2016

Abate by

Sep 22, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2): The employer did not provide employees with effective information on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area. Employees were not informed of the following: the requirements of this section; any operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals are present; and, the location and availability of the written hazard communication program, including the required list(s) of hazardous chemicals, and safety data sheets as required by this section.    In the maintenance shop, the employer did not provide effective information on hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to bead sealer and rubber cleaner at the time of their initial assignment.

Issued

May 26, 2016

Abate by

Sep 22, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3): The employer did not provide employees with effective training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area. The employee training did not include the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i) through (h)(3)(iv):    In the maintenance shop, the employer did not provide effective training on hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to bead sealer and rubber cleaner at the time of their initial assignment.

Issued

May 26, 2016

Abate by

Jul 22, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):     In the maintenance shop, the employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitated the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for employees performing automobile repair and maintenance.

Issued

May 26, 2016

Abate by

Jun 22, 2016

Penalty

Initial $400 · Current $240 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0689

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:    In the maintenance shop, the employer did not provide information in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134 to employees that voluntarily used N95 respirators while removing wheel corrosion with an abrasive pad.