Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: S.E. TAMPA, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of S.E. TAMPA, INC. in 7018 N 30TH STREET, TAMPA, FL 33610 (NAICS 311999). OSHA activity number 341180602.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch S.E. Tampa, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for S.E. Tampa, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
S.E. TAMPA, INC.
Site address
7018 N 30TH STREET
City
TAMPA
State
FL
ZIP
33610
Mailing
7018 N 30TH STREET, TAMPA, FL 33610
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311999
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2016
Abate by
Apr 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  A) At the noodle manufacturing plant where the conveyors of the dough rollers (kneaders) were not protected and employees were exposed to caught in hazards. An employee was injured while cleaning one of them on or about 01/06/2016.  B) At the dough mixing area, employees were exposed to caught-in and struck-by hazards by the mixing blades that remain in motion while operating the equipment in the manual mode as observed on or 01/15/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $240 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours.   A) At the establishemnt, the hospitalization of an employee that suffered a work related injury on or about 01/06/2016 was not made to OSHA.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $240
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2016
Abate by
Apr 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  A) At the noodle manufacturing plant where employees used lubricating chemicals including WD-40 among others to provide maintenance to the equipment and the facility. No written hazard communication program was developed as observed on or about 01/15/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2016
Abate by
Apr 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1): The chemical manufacturer, importer, or distributor did not ensure that each container of classified hazardous chemicals leaving the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information required in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(vi)  A) At the noodle manufacturing plant where employees used lubricating chemicals including WD-40 among others to provide maintenance to the equipment and the facility. Unlabeled containers of chemicals were observed on or about 01/15/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2016
Abate by
Apr 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use  A) At the noodle manufacturing plant where employees used lubricating chemicals including WD-40 among others to provide maintenance to the equipment and the facility. Safety data sheets were not available as observed on or about 01/15/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2016
Abate by
Apr 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:  A) At the noodle manufacturing plant where employees used lubricating chemicals including WD-40 among others to provide maintenance to the equipment and the facility. No employee training was provided as observed on or about 01/15/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341180602.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.