SAN ANTONIO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ESPINOZA MASONRY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ESPINOZA MASONRY in 435 BURR ST., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78209 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341183382.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ESPINOZA MASONRY
- Site address
- 435 BURR ST.
- City
- SAN ANTONIO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78209
- Mailing
- 138 DANNY CLAY, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78228
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: On or about January 14, 2016, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when not wearing protective helmets, while other employees were working above them on the scaffolds, while installing lath and plaster to the wall.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): Front side of residential home, On or about January 14, 2016, employees were exposed to falls greater than 10 feet in height to the ground level below, when working from the work platform of the scaffold, which had only three scaffold planks and at other levels only one, while installing the lath to the wall.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 B05 II
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): Each platform greater than 10 feet in length shall not extend over its support more than 18 inches (46 cm), unless it is designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilevered end. Front side of residential home, On or about January 14, 2016, employees were exposed to falls greater than 10 feet in height to the ground level below, when working from the work platform of the scaffold, which had only three scaffold planks and extended approximately 24 inches pasted the frame support, while installing the lath to the wall.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Scaffold frames were used as a means of access: North side of residential home, On or about January 14, 2016, employees were exposed to falls greater than 10 feet in height to the ground level below, when working from the work platform of the scaffold, which was not provided with a ladder, while installing the lath to the wall.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: North side of residential home, On or about January 14, 2016, employees were exposed to falls greater than 10 feet in height to the ground level below, when working from the work platform of the scaffold, which was not provided with guard railing, while installing the lath to the wall.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Mar 7, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Front side of residential home, On or about January 14, 2016, employees were exposed to falls greater than 6 feet in height to the ground level below, when using an extension ladder, which had only 12 inches of ladder above the landing, while climbing down the ladder.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections at Espinoza Masonry
View Espinoza Masonry's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341183382.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.