Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ESPINOZA MASONRY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ESPINOZA MASONRY in 435 BURR ST., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78209 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341183382.

Watch Espinoza Masonry — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Espinoza Masonry is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ESPINOZA MASONRY
Site address
435 BURR ST.
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78209
Mailing
138 DANNY CLAY, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78228
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about January 14, 2016, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when not wearing protective helmets, while other employees were working above them on the scaffolds, while installing lath and plaster to the wall.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):   Front side of residential home, On or about January 14, 2016, employees were exposed to falls greater than 10 feet in height to the ground level below, when working from the work platform of the scaffold, which had only three scaffold planks and at other levels only one, while installing the lath to the wall.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 B05 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): Each platform greater than 10 feet in length shall not extend over its support more than 18 inches (46 cm), unless it is designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilevered end.  Front side of residential home, On or about January 14, 2016, employees were exposed to falls greater than 10 feet in height to the ground level below, when working from the work platform of the scaffold, which had only three scaffold planks and extended approximately 24 inches pasted the frame support, while installing the lath to the wall.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Scaffold frames were used as a means of access:   North side of residential home, On or about January 14, 2016, employees were exposed to falls greater than 10 feet in height to the ground level below, when working from the work platform of the scaffold, which was not provided with a ladder, while installing the lath to the wall.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:   North side of residential home, On or about January 14, 2016, employees were exposed to falls greater than 10 feet in height to the ground level below, when working from the work platform of the scaffold, which was not provided with guard railing, while installing the lath to the wall.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2016
Abate by
Mar 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Front side of residential home, On or about January 14, 2016, employees were exposed to falls greater than 6 feet in height to the ground level below, when using an extension ladder, which had only 12 inches of ladder above the landing, while climbing down the ladder.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1200

View Espinoza Masonry's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341183382.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.