LITHIA SPRINGS, GA —
OSHA Inspection: PRO BODY SHOP
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of PRO BODY SHOP in 3846 BANKHEAD HIGHWAY, LITHIA SPRINGS, GA 30122 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 341185809.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PRO BODY SHOP
- Site address
- 3846 BANKHEAD HIGHWAY
- City
- LITHIA SPRINGS
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30122
- Mailing
- 3846 BANKHEAD HIGHWAY, LITHIA SPRINGS, GA 30122
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2016
- Abate by
- May 19, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1539H130
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) Spray painting area- The employer had not established a written respiratory protection program for an employee required to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while spray painting automobile parts.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1539H130
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) Spray Painting Area- An employee required to wear a tight-fitting face piece respirator while spray painting automobile parts had not received a medical evaluation to determine his ability to safely wear the respirator.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1539H130
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested: (a) Spray Painting Area- An employee required to wear a tight-fitting face piece respirator while spray painting automobile parts had not received an annual fit test.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2016
- Abate by
- May 19, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0440153924602590H130
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) Spray painting area- The employer had not established a written hazard communication program for an employee exposed to hazardous substances such as, but not limited to, paints and hardeners containing isocyanates, xylene, toluene and n-butyl acetate.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Apr 25, 2016
- Abate by
- May 19, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0440153924602590H130
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication training did not include an explanation of the Global Harmonization System (GHS) with respect to the labeling, pictograms, and safety data sheets, including the order of information and how employees could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: (a) Spray painting area- The employer did not provide hazard communication training to employees on the new Global Harmonization System (GHS) that took effect on December 1, 2013.The employee was not familiar with the new standard, safety data sheets, and pictograms. The employee was exposed to hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to, paints and hardeners/activators containing xylene, toluene, butyl acetate, and isocyanates.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at PRO Body Shop
View PRO Body Shop's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341185809.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.