Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HANEL CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HANEL CORPORATION in 16600 W. RYERSON RD., NEW BERLIN, WI 53151 (NAICS 336311). OSHA activity number 341189959.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hanel Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hanel Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HANEL CORPORATION
Site address
16600 W. RYERSON RD.
City
NEW BERLIN
State
WI
ZIP
53151
Mailing
16600 W. RYERSON RD., NEW BERLIN, WI 53151
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336311
Employees
32
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,517 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit routes were not free and/or unobstructed. No materials or equipment may be placed, either permanently or temporarily, within the exit route.     (a) The exit door located on the west side of the production facility had materials stacked against the exit door, obstructing exit through the door.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1517

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 2016
Abate by
Sep 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures are not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:     (a) Written machine/equipment specific energy control procedures are not developed, documented, and utilized for authorized personnel to follow when performing maintenance, repair, and other associated mechanical diagnostic procedures on CNC machines, air compressor and other associated production equipment and processes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 2016
Abate by
Aug 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    (a) In the vicinity of the compressor room, where employees use Phosphoric Acid 75% technical, a corrosive liquid to clean metal parts of rust, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 9 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 2016
Abate by
Jul 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts:    (a) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-1: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have the rotating cutting tools guarded. The doors that enclosed the milling process and other rotating parts had the interlock bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.    (b) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-2: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have the rotating cutting tools guarded. The doors that enclosed the milling process and other rotating parts had the interlock bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.    (c) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-3: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have the rotating cutting tools guarded. The doors that enclosed the milling process and other rotating parts  had the interlock bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.    (d) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-4: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have the rotating cutting tools guarded. The doors that enclosed the milling process and other rotating parts  had the interlock bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.    (e) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-5: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have the rotating cutting tools guarded. The doors that enclosed the milling process and other rotating parts had the interlock bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.    (f) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-9: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have the rotating cutting tools guarded. The doors that enclosed the milling process and other rotating parts had the interlock bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.      (g) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-22: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have the rotating cutting tools guarded. The sliding door that enclosed the milling process and other rotating parts  had the interlock bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.    (h) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-23: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have the rotating cutting tools guarded. The sliding door that enclosed the milling process and other rotating parts had the interlock bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.    (i) Miyano CNC Lathe Machine T-26: Employees operated a Miyano CNC Lathe that did not have the rotating cutting tools guarded. The sliding door that enclosed the milling process and other rotating parts had the interlock bypassed and glass on the sliding door removed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3400
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 2016
Abate by
Jul 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  (a) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-1: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have point of operation guarded in-that the vertical door interlock was bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.  (b) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-2: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have point of operation guarded in-that the vertical door interlock was bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.  (c) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-3: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have point of operation guarded in-that the vertical door interlock was bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.  (d) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-4: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have point of operation guarded in-that the vertical door interlock was bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.  (e) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-5: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have point of operation guarded in-that the vertical door interlock was bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.  (f) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-9: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have point of operation guarded in-that the vertical door interlock was bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.  (g) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-22: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have point of operation guarded in-that the vertical door interlock was bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.  (h) KMX CNC Lathe Machine T-23: Employees operated a KMX CNC Lathe that did not have point of operation guarded in-that the vertical door interlock was bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.  (i) Miyano CNC Lathe Machine T-26: Employees operated a Miyano CNC Lathe that did not have the point of operation guarded in-that the vertical door interlock was bypassed exposing the operator to a caught-in/on hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jul 8, 2016
Abate by
Sep 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:    (a) Employees are exposed to metal working fluids, oils, lubricants, solvents, acids and other materials used in manufacturing operations and performance of maintenance work activities. Training was not provided regarding the Hazard Communication 2012 standard and new Global Harmonization (GHS) label elements (product identifier, signal word, pictogram, hazard statement(s), and precautionary requirements) and new safety data sheet (SDS) format.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1785

View Hanel Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341189959.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.