ALVIN, TX —
OSHA Inspection: J.W. HALL
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J.W. HALL in 17731 ELIZABETH RD, ALVIN, TX 77511 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 341191112.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J.W. HALL
- Site address
- 17731 ELIZABETH RD
- City
- ALVIN
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77511
- Mailing
- 17731 ELIZABETH RD, ALVIN, TX 77511
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332999
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): At the warehouse; employer did not provide forklift training to operators, exposing employees to struck By hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $600
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) At warehouse, employees used an unguarded Dyna Path Lathe, unknown Model and serial number, exposing employees to caught in hazards. b) At Warehouse; employees uses an 80 Ton Atlantic Hydraulic Press, unknown Model and serial number, exposing employees to caught in hazards. c) At Warehouse; employees uses an Ellis Drill Press, Model number 4OO and serial number 94D05367, exposing employees to caught in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: At the warehouse; employees used a KO-SHIN ELEC & MACH grinder, serial# 11207or unknown model number which exceeded one eight inch, exposing the employee to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $600
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: At the warehouse; employees used the KO-SHIN ELEC & MACH grinder, serial # 11207or unknown model number that exceeded 1/4 inch, exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $600
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.252 B02 III
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields: At the warehouse; employees were not protected from the rays of the welding machines, exposing employees to eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.303 G01
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment: At the warehouse, electrical panels; employer did not provide sufficient access, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $600
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: At the warehouse, electrical panel; employees utilize an electrical panels with unused opening, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $600
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose: At the warehouse; the employer did not place a cover on a pull boxes, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332999)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341191112.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.