WEST MONROE, LA —
OSHA Inspection: ASTRO INDUSTRIES
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ASTRO INDUSTRIES in 901 INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, WEST MONROE, LA 71291 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 341192896.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ASTRO INDUSTRIES
- Site address
- 901 INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY
- City
- WEST MONROE
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 71291
- Mailing
- 901 INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, WEST MONROE, LA 71291
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326199
- Employees
- 24
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 D01 III
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1)(iii): Flight(s) of stairs with 4 or more risers, less than 44 inches wide and having both sides open were not equipped with one standard stair railing on each side: On or about1/21/16 in the production department on the east side; the flight of stairs (five risers, 27" wide) leading to the Extruder machine did not have hand rails on either side; thus exposing employees to a 6' fall from the top riser.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): On or about 1/21/16 at the west side of building near storage; the employer allowed employees to operate the Hyster propane fork truck (Model S50CT/Serial #A267V01999L) to move boxes and the employer did not ensure that the truck operators were competent to operate the truck safely.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s) On or about 1/21/16 at the west side of building near storage; the employer allowed employees to operate the Hyster propane fork truck (Model S50CT/Serial #A267V01999L) to move boxes and the fork truck had a broken seat belt and horn.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by point of operation: On or about 1/21/16 in the Warehouse building; the employer allowed the other employees to be exposed to the unguarded blade of the hydraulic shear (no model and serial numbers) where the opening is 8' wide on the north and south sides and 12' tall, and the guillotine blade is 6.5' tall; thus exposing employees to fatal injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.147 C04 II B
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy. On or about 1/21/16; throughout the shop; the employer allowed employees to lockout the Hoskawa and Cumberland grinders, the extruder, hydraulic guillontine shear and bailer machines without developing machine-specific lockout procedures for those machines.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: On or about 1/21/16; throughout the shop; the employer allowed employees to lockout the Hoskawa and Cumberland grinders, the extruder, hydraulic guillontine shear and bailer machines, and without machine-specific lockout procedures for those machines, and the employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedures.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1910.147 C07 IV
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(iv): The employer did not certify that employee training had been accomplished and kept up to date: On or about 1/21/16; throughout the shop; the employer allowed employees to lockout the Hoskawa and Cumberland grinders, the extruder, hydraulic guillontine shear and bailer machines, and the employer did not certify that employee training had been accomplished and kept up to date:
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326199)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341192896.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.