Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DAYAN BELMONTES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAYAN BELMONTES in 5702 SAN MIGUEL, MIDLAND, TX 79705 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341209054.

Watch Dayan Belmontes — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dayan Belmontes is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DAYAN BELMONTES
Site address
5702 SAN MIGUEL
City
MIDLAND
State
TX
ZIP
79705
Mailing
3220 WEST KANSAS, MIDLAND, TX 79701
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  Employees without hard hats were working on the ground while other employees performed framing activities above and exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents.  Employees engaged in roofing work were exposed to struck-by hazards while operating pneumatic nail guns  without eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Employees engaged in framing operations were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341209054.