Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: ROSANELLY CONSTRUCTION LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROSANELLY CONSTRUCTION LLC in 5100 CAMPBELLS RUN ROAD, PITTSBURGH, PA 15226 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 341210961.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rosanelly Construction LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rosanelly Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5100 CAMPBELLS RUN ROAD
City
PITTSBURGH
State
PA
ZIP
15226
Mailing
7980 SOUTH EAGLE VALLEY ROAD, PORT MATILDA, PA 16870
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2016
Abate by
May 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $804 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training would be met:      a) Job site, 5100 Campbells Run Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about March 22, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that a hazard communication program was implemented where employees worked with chemicals such as Portland Cement and Dryvit, a product which contained silica.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $804
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2016
Abate by
Jun 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:      a) Job site, 5100 Campbells Run Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about March 22, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not have safety data sheets for chemicals such as Portland Cement and Dryvit, a product which contained silica.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2016
Abate by
Jun 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area.:      a) Job site, 5100 Campbells Run Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about March 22, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that effective chemical safety training was provided where employees worked with chemicals such as Portland Cement and Dryvit, a product which contained silica.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2016
Abate by
May 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,340 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights was no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer could demonstrate that a wider space was necessary (for example, to fit around uprights when side brackets are used to extend the width of the platform):      a) Job site, 5100 Campbells Run Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about April 1, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that scaffold platforms were fully planked in all working areas.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1340
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 E08

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(8): Direct access to or from another surface was not used only when the scaffold is not more than 14 inches (36 cm) horizontally and not more than 24 inches (61 cm) vertically from the other surface:   a) Job site, 5100 Campbells Run Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about March 22, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that safe access to/from scaffolding existed in that the employer allowed employees to move between two scaffold systems that were approximately 3 feet apart with no fall protection or planking in use, exposing employees to fall hazards of up to approximately at least 35 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:   Instances including, but not limited to the following:  a) Job site, 5100 Campbells Run Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about March 22, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that the scaffold system in use was given an appropriate safety inspection by a competent person prior to the start of work. Deficiencies noted during the inspection included, but were not limited to, the lack of fall protection systems/devices being used by employees performing work on the scaffold and the lack of a safe means of moving between two scaffold systems.  b) Job site, 5100 Campbells Run Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about April 1, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that the scaffold system in use was given an appropriate safety inspection by a competent person prior to the start of work. Deficiencies noted during the inspection included, but were not limited to, the lack of pins being used in frame and post panels and failing to provide adequate planking on all working areas.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms:   Instances including, but not limited to the following:  a) Job site, 5100 Campbells Run Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about March 22, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that guardrail systems were in use along all open sides or ends of scaffolding, exposing employees to fall hazards of up to at least approximately 35 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.452 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2016
Abate by
May 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(3): Frames and panels were not joined together vertically by coupling or stacking pins or equivalent means:   a) Job site, 5100 Campbells Run Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about April 1, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that scaffold frames were properly pinned or otherwise secured together.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2016
Abate by
Jun 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Where the employer determined that voluntary respirator use was permissible, the employer did not provide the respirator users with the information contained in Appendix D to this section ("Information for Employees Using Respirators When Not Required Under the Standard"):       a) Job site, 5100 Campbells Run Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about March 22, 2016, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that information contained in appendix D of the standard was provided to employees where respirator use was voluntary.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Rosanelly Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341210961.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.