Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J & P KHAMKEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of J & P KHAMKEN INDUSTRIES, INC. in 3445 LOWER WETUMPKA RD, MONTGOMERY, AL 36110 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 341216083.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J & P Khamken Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J & P Khamken Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3445 LOWER WETUMPKA RD
City
MONTGOMERY
State
AL
ZIP
36110
Mailing
3445 LOWER WETUMPKA RD, MONTGOMERY, AL 36110
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,700
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a) On or about January 27, 2016 and times prior; Phoenix S000607 horizontal band saw: The employer failed to ensure the unused portion of the blade was guarded to prevent inadvertent contact during use.  b) On or about January 27, 2016 and times prior; Phoenix D02066 horizontal band saw: The employer failed to ensure the unused portion of the blade was guarded to prevent inadvertent contact during use.  c) On or about January 27, 2016 and times prior; big lathe: The employer failed to ensure the lathes were properly guarded to prevent inadvertent contact with the point of operation during operation and metal shavings from hitting the employee.  d) On or about January 27, 2016 and times prior; Atrump milling machine: The employer failed to ensure the milling machines were properly guarded to prevent inadvertent contact with the rotating bit during operation and metal shavings from striking the employee.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $1,020
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work:  a) On or about January 27, 2016 and times prior; bench grinder: The employer failed to ensure the work rest was properly adjusted to within 1/8 of an inch to the grinding wheel to prevent employees from getting fingers pulled in.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  a) On or about January 27, 2016 and times prior; bench grinder tongue guard: The employer failed to ensure the tongue guard was properly adjusted to within 1/4 inch of the wheel to prevent the employee from getting struck-by debris.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 P01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):  a) On or about January 27, 2016 and times prior; the yellow forklift: The employer failed to ensure the damaged seat was replaced to provide proper seating for the operator to maintain control during travel.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.242 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment was not used when compressed air was used for cleaning purposes:  a) On or about January 27, 2016 and times prior; CNC machine: The employer failed to ensure employees used proper personal protective equipment such as a face shield when cleaning the machine with pneumatic air with around 80psi to prevent blow back into the eyes.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 14, 2016
Abate by
Mar 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the  safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a) On or about January 27, 2016 and times prior; global harmonization training: The employer failed to ensure employees were trained on the new global harmonization training which include the new safety data sheet format and the use of picture grams on labels for chemicals such as coolant, oil, and grease.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View J & P Khamken Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341216083.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.