WALLINGFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ARNOLD SUPPLY, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ARNOLD SUPPLY, INC. in 67 SOUTH TURNPIKE ROAD, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492 (NAICS 423710). OSHA activity number 341218527.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARNOLD SUPPLY, INC.
- Site address
- 67 SOUTH TURNPIKE ROAD
- City
- WALLINGFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06492
- Mailing
- 67 SOUTH TURNPIKE ROAD, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423710
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.38 A
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(a): The employer did not establish a written emergency evacuation plan for employees expected to evacuate in the event of a fire or other emergency. ESTABLISHMENT: The employer, who had elected to have a total workplace evacuation did not establish and implement a written emergency evacuation plan.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.39 A
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.39(a): The fire prevention plan required by 29 CFR 1910.157(a) or (b) where the employer had elected to partially or totally evacuate the workplace in the event of a fire emergency was not in writing. ESTABLISHMENT: The employer, who had elected to have a total workplace evacuation did not develop and implement a written fire prevention plan.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not perform a Workplace Hazard Assessment to determine necessitate and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not provide training and information to each employee required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not ensure through providing training and information that the operator of the Clark powered industrial forklift truck (PIT) was competent to operate the PIT safely at all times.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: ESTABLISHMENT: The three (3) unused openings on the electrical circuit breaker panel were not effectively closed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not develop and implement a written Hazard Communication program where employees were required to work with and/or handle hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) oils, lubricants, and adhesives.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not provide training and information on the chemical hazard communications for the employees who were required to work with and/or handle chemicals, such as (but not limited to) oils, lubricants, and adhesives.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423710)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341218527.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.