ALLENTOWN, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: GILLESPIE PRINTING, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GILLESPIE PRINTING, INC. in 709 ROBLE ROAD UNIT 1, ALLENTOWN, PA 18109 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 341221364.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GILLESPIE PRINTING, INC.
- Site address
- 709 ROBLE ROAD UNIT 1
- City
- ALLENTOWN
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18109
- Mailing
- 709 ROBLE ROAD, ALLENTOWN, PA 18109
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323111
- Employees
- 19
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): a. Dock Area - on or about February 25, 2016, employees were operating Clark Model TW25B electric forklift for loading and storage operations, but the employer did not certify that each operator had successfully completed training and received evaluation of that training.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1120
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 26, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,980 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. West wall in Binding Area - on or about February 25, 2016 employees operated a three hole paper drill manufactured by Challenge to punch holes in stacks of paper. The point of operation was not guarded, exposing employees to caught-in hazards. b. West wall in Binding Area - on or about February 25, 2016 employees operated a single hole paper drill with model number 4264 manufactured by Challenge to punch holes in stacks of paper. The point of operation was not guarded, exposing employees to caught-in hazards. c. Press Room - on or about February 25, 2016, employees operated an Original Heidelberg windmill press used for die cutting operations. Machine guarding was not provided to protect operators and other employees from the ingoing nip points at the ink rollers. d. Press Room - on or about February 25, 2016, employees operated an Original Heidelberg windmill press used for die cutting operations. Machine guarding was not provided to protect operators and other employees from the rotating windmill, exposing employees to struck-by hazards. e. Press Room - on or about February 25, 2016, employees operated an Original Heidelberg windmill press used for die cutting operations. Machine guarding was not provided to protect operators and other employees from the platen zone, exposing employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1980
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting: a. Binding Area - on or about February 25, 2016 employees used a Rollem Auto 4 to perforate, score, and number paper for printing press operations. Two horizontal rotating shafts were observed unguarded, exposing employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. Prepress Room and Press Room - on or about February 25, 2016, employees used chemicals to include, but not limited to, inks, Tam Blend, and Water Miscible Wash for printing press operations, but the employer had not developed, implemented and maintained a written hazard communication program for the worksite.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1700
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. Throughout Shop - on or about February 25, 2016, employees were operating printing presses with the use of chemicals to include, but not limited to, inks, Water Miscible Wash and Tam Blend, but the employer had not provided employees training on hazards for chemicals used.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1904.32 A04
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(4): The employer did not post an OSHA 300A Form or equivalent by February 1 thru April 30. a) Facility - On or about February 25, 2016, the employer failed to post the annual summary of work-related injuries and illnesses.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly: a) Throughout Shop - on or about February 25, 2016, the ABC dry chemical, portable fire extinguishers available in the facility for employee use did not have visual inspections performed at least monthly.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.303 G01
- Issued
- Mar 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment: a. Circuit Breaker Panel/East side in front of Press Room - on or about February 25, 2016, pallets of printed product were placed in front of a circuit breaker panel, restricting access to permit ready access for safe operation and maintenance of such equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323111)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341221364.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.