Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: GILLESPIE PRINTING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GILLESPIE PRINTING, INC. in 709 ROBLE ROAD UNIT 1, ALLENTOWN, PA 18109 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 341221364.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gillespie Printing, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gillespie Printing, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
709 ROBLE ROAD UNIT 1
City
ALLENTOWN
State
PA
ZIP
18109
Mailing
709 ROBLE ROAD, ALLENTOWN, PA 18109
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323111
Employees
19
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2016
Abate by
Mar 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):    a. Dock Area - on or about February 25, 2016, employees were operating Clark Model TW25B electric forklift for loading and storage operations, but the employer did not certify that each operator had successfully completed training and received evaluation of that training.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2016
Abate by
Mar 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,980 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a. West wall in Binding Area - on or about February 25, 2016 employees operated a three hole paper drill manufactured by Challenge to punch holes in stacks of paper. The point of operation was not guarded, exposing employees to caught-in hazards.    b. West wall in Binding Area - on or about February 25, 2016 employees operated a single hole paper drill with model number 4264 manufactured by Challenge to punch holes in stacks of paper. The point of operation was not guarded, exposing employees to caught-in hazards.    c. Press Room - on or about February 25, 2016, employees operated an Original Heidelberg windmill press used for die cutting operations. Machine guarding was not provided to protect operators and other employees from the ingoing nip points at the ink rollers.    d. Press Room - on or about February 25, 2016, employees operated an Original Heidelberg windmill press used for die cutting operations. Machine guarding was not provided to protect operators and other employees from the rotating windmill, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.    e. Press Room - on or about February 25, 2016, employees operated an Original Heidelberg windmill press used for die cutting operations. Machine guarding was not provided to protect operators and other employees from the platen zone, exposing employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1980
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2016
Abate by
Apr 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:    a. Binding Area - on or about February 25, 2016 employees used a Rollem Auto 4 to perforate, score, and number paper for printing press operations. Two horizontal rotating shafts were observed unguarded, exposing employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2016
Abate by
Mar 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a. Prepress Room and Press Room - on or about February 25, 2016, employees used chemicals to include, but not limited to, inks, Tam Blend, and Water Miscible Wash for printing press operations, but the employer had not developed, implemented and maintained a written hazard communication program for the worksite.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1700
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2016
Abate by
Mar 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a. Throughout Shop - on or about February 25, 2016, employees were operating printing presses with the use of chemicals to include, but not limited to, inks, Water Miscible Wash and Tam Blend, but the employer had not provided employees training on hazards for chemicals used.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1904.32 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2016
Abate by
Mar 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(4): The employer did not post an OSHA 300A Form or equivalent by February 1 thru April 30.  a) Facility - On or about February 25, 2016, the employer failed to post the annual summary of work-related injuries and illnesses.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.157 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2016
Abate by
Mar 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:  a) Throughout Shop - on or about February 25, 2016, the ABC dry chemical, portable fire extinguishers available in the facility for employee use did not have visual inspections performed at least monthly.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.303 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:  a. Circuit Breaker Panel/East side in front of Press Room - on or about February 25, 2016, pallets of printed product were placed in front of a circuit breaker panel, restricting access to permit ready access for safe operation and maintenance of such equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341221364.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.