Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: KBS BUILDERS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KBS BUILDERS, INC. in 300 PARK STREET, SOUTH PARIS, ME 04281 (NAICS 321991). OSHA activity number 341222107.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch KBS Builders, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for KBS Builders, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KBS BUILDERS, INC.
Site address
300 PARK STREET
City
SOUTH PARIS
State
ME
ZIP
04281
Mailing
P.O. BOX 220, SOUTH PARIS, ME 04281
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321991
Employees
90
Ownership type
Private (A)

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 2, 2016
Abate by
Apr 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1):  In the following instances, all places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition:  a)    Mezzanine - Sections of the perforated metal floor were not secured or were not laying flat which created a tripping hazard along the edges. Debris such as cardboard boxes and construction materials were also cluttering the floor.  b)    Throughout the facility, especially around saws without dust collection systems,  an accumulation of wood dust was present creating a fire/explosion hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 7 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 2, 2016
Abate by
Mar 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:  Mezzanine - There were seven sections of the guardrail where a midrail and toeboard were missing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.24 H

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 2, 2016
Abate by
Mar 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.24(h): Standard railings were not provided on the open sides of all exposed stairways and stair platforms:  Production area - The railing on the stairway going to the mezzanine did not have a midrail.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 2, 2016
Abate by
Mar 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  At the facility - The employer did not have an energy control program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 2, 2016
Abate by
Mar 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  At the Facility - The employer had not conducted an inspection of the energy control program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Mar 2, 2016
Abate by
Mar 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure:  At the Facility - Employees affected by the energy control program/procedure had not been trained in its purpose or use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Mar 2, 2016
Abate by
Apr 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  At the Facility - The employer had not developed, implemented nor maintained a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Mar 2, 2016
Abate by
Apr 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): Employee training did not include the details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labeling system and the material safety data sheet, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  At the Facility - The employer did not train employees in the new label elements and the new Safety Data Sheet, SDS, format per the revised Hazard Communication Standard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 70 exposed
Issued
Mar 2, 2016
Abate by
Apr 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  At the Facility - The employer had not assessed the entire workplace to determine if hazards exist which necessitate the use of PPE.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.303 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 2, 2016
Abate by
Mar 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:  Mezzanine - The four receptacle outlet box was not mounted.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 2, 2016
Abate by
Mar 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  Finishing Area - There was no strain relief provided to the electric cord on the hydraulic pump.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View KBS Builders, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341222107.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.