NORTHUMBERLAND, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: STRONG INDUSTRIES INC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of STRONG INDUSTRIES INC in 3204 POINT TWP. DR., NORTHUMBERLAND, PA 17857 (NAICS 339920). OSHA activity number 341222545.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STRONG INDUSTRIES INC
- Site address
- 3204 POINT TWP. DR.
- City
- NORTHUMBERLAND
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 17857
- Mailing
- PO BOX 108, NORTHUMBERLAND, PA 17857
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 339920
- Employees
- 150
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,295 · Current $1,721 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) Employees were required to wear a 3M elastomeric half mask while spraying isocyanates and a written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented, on or about 2-17-16. (b) Employees were required to wear a 3M elastomeric half mask while assisting in the spray application of isocyanates and a written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented, on or about 2-17-16. (c) Employees were required to wear a 3M elastomeric half mask while changing the basket filter for the isocyanates and a written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented, on or about 2-17-16 ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1721.25
- · Z (S) $2295
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was required to wear the respirator in the workplace: (a) Employees were required to wear a 3M elastomeric half mask while spraying isocyanates and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee wore the respirator in the workplace, on or about 2-17-16. (b) Employees were required to wear a 3M elastomeric half mask while assisting in the spray application of isocyanates and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee wore the respirator in the workplace, on or about 2-17-16. (c) Employees were required to wear a 3M elastomeric half mask while changing the basket filter for the isocyanates and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee wore the respirator in the workplace, on or about 2-17-16. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a) Employees were required to wear a 3M elastomeric half mask while spraying isocyanates and the employees were not fit tested, on or about 2-17-16. (b) Employees were required to wear a 3M elastomeric half mask while assisting in the spray application of isocyanates and the employees were not fit tested, on or about 2-17-16. (c) Employees were required to wear a 3M elastomeric half mask while changing the basket filter for the isocyanates and the employees were not fit tested, on or about 2-17-16. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: a) Employees were required to wear a 3M elastomeric half mask while spraying isocyanates , and training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace, on or about 2-17-16. (b) Employees were required to wear a 3M elastomeric half mask while assisting in the spray application of isocyanates , and training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace, on or about 2-17-16. (c) Employees were required to wear a 3M elastomeric half mask while changing the basket filter for the isocyanates, and training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace, on or about 2-17-16. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: a) Employees were required to wear a 3M elastomeric half mask while spraying isocyanates and the employee had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece, on or about 2-17-16. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,295 · Current $1,721 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a.) Employees spray and apply isocyanates and effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment was not provided, on or about 2-17-16. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1721.25
- · Z (S) $2295
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a.) Employees spray and apply isocyanates and employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met, on or about 2-17-16. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.120 Q02
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(2): The employer did not develop an emergency response plan for emergencies which addressed the following minimum requirements of this standard: 1910.120(q)(2)(i) through 1910.120(q)(2)(xii): a.) The employer did not develop an emergency response plan for emergencies involving six totes of isocyanates weighing 2500 pounds that were stored in an un-diked area of the production floor, on or about 2-2-16. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections at Strong Industries INC
View Strong Industries INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 339920)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341222545.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.