Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ARNOLDO CRUZ REYES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARNOLDO CRUZ REYES in 103 BLUE MOON DRIVE, WAXAHACHIE, TX 75165 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341223725.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Arnoldo Cruz Reyes — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Arnoldo Cruz Reyes is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ARNOLDO CRUZ REYES
Site address
103 BLUE MOON DRIVE
City
WAXAHACHIE
State
TX
ZIP
75165
Mailing
9809 DALE CREST DR. #1018, DALLAS, TX 75220
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2016
Abate by
Mar 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a):  Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  At the residential construction site, the employer did not provide hard hats to employees performing framing activities. The employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck by falling framing supplies.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2016
Abate by
Mar 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  At the residential construction site, employees performing framing activities operating pneumatic nail guns were not provided with eye protection exposing the employees to eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2016
Abate by
Mar 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv):  Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:   At the residential construction site, employees were using an extension cord to power a Makita saw that had the outer sheathing pulled away exposing the internal wiring. The employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2016
Abate by
Mar 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  At a residential construction site,  employees performing framing activities without fall protection were exposed to a fall hazard at a height of over 20 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2016
Abate by
Mar 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    At the residential construction site, the employer did not ensure employees performing framing activities were trained to recognize and avoid fall hazards and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize or avoid those hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341223725.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.