AMARILLO, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: ANIMAL LODGE, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ANIMAL LODGE, LLC in 3201 S. WESTERN STREET, AMARILLO, TX 79109 (NAICS 812910). OSHA activity number 341224814.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANIMAL LODGE, LLC
- Site address
- 3201 S. WESTERN STREET
- City
- AMARILLO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79109
- Mailing
- 3201 S. WESTERN STREET, AMARILLO, TX 79109
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 812910
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,080 · Current $648 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: The employer did not assess the cleaning process of the kennel and yard areas to determine the need for personal protective equipment and exposed employees to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $648
- · Z (S) $1080
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,160 · Current $1,296 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): The employer did not determine if the voluntary use of a respirator did not in itself create a hazard. Failure to provide voluntary respirator users with a copy of Appendix D should be cited under 29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6). The employer did not provide Appendix D for employees were exposed to health hazards and skin infections while voluntarily using a half mask respirator while mixing and using cleaning chemicals in the kennel, cabin and yard areas.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1296
- · Z (S) $2160
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program and exposed employees using a 3M half mask respirator to health hazards and skin infections.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. Note: The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator. The employer did not medically evaluate employees voluntarily wearing a negative pressure respirator to mix chemicals and exposed them to adverse health hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 H01 I
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1)(i): Respirators issued for the exclusive use of an employee were not cleaned and disinfected as often as necessary to be maintained in a sanitary condition: The employer did not ensure respirators were cleaned and stored for employees who voluntarily wore them and exposed them to adverse health hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,080 · Current $648 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: The employer did not ensure a functional eye wash station was available for employees working with chemicals in and around the kennel and yard areas and exposed them to adverse health hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $648
- · Z (S) $1080
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,080 · Current $648 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): The employer did not have a written hazard communication program for employees working with chemicals used to clean animal waste and exposed them to adverse health hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $648
- · Z (S) $1080
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet: The employer did not provide a list of chemicals for employees working with chemicals and exposed them to adverse health effects.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F06
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer used written materials, such as signs, placards, process sheets, or batch tickets in lieu of affixing labels to individual stationary process containers which were not readily accessible to the employees in their work area throughout their work shift. The employer did not ensure chemical containers stored near the kennel and tub area were properly labeled and exposed employees to adverse health hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 812910)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341224814.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.