COLLEGE STATION, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: ANTONIO IPINA
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of ANTONIO IPINA in 2045 JONES BUTLER RD, COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 341225183.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANTONIO IPINA
- Site address
- 2045 JONES BUTLER RD
- City
- COLLEGE STATION
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77840
- Mailing
- 520 GULF BANK TRAILER 204, HOUSTON, TX 77037
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person: On or about February 03, 2016, the employer did not ensure that the pump jack scaffolding system used on site was designed by a qualified person, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. On or about February 03, 2016, and at times prior thereto, the employees were not trained by a competent person to recognize the hazards associated with the use of a pump jack scaffold system, exposing the employees to fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question. On or about February 03, 2016, and at times prior thereto, scaffold erectors were not trained by a competent person to properly erect pump jack scaffold system, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation. On or about February 03, 2016, the employer did not ensure that the pump jack scaffold system installed on the west side of the property under construction had base plates and mud sills installed, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level: On or about February 03, 2016, the employer did not ensure that the pump jack scaffold system installed on the west side of the property under construction had guardrails installed, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.452 J01
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(1): Pump jack brackets, braces, and accessories were not fabricated from metal plates and angles. Each pump jack bracket did not have two positive gripping mechanisms to prevent any failure or slippage. On or about February 03, 2016, the employer did not ensure that the pump jack brackets, braces, and accessories were fabricated from metal plates and angles on the scaffolding system installed on the west side of the property under construction, exposing the pump jack scaffold to failure or slippage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Mar 14, 2016
- Abate by
- Mar 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. On or about February 03, 2016, the employer did not ensure that the pump jack scaffold system set up on the west side of the property under construction was secure to the structure with rigid triangular bracing, exposing the scaffolding to a collapse or failure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341225183.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.