Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: RANCH STUCCO AND MASONRY LLC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RANCH STUCCO AND MASONRY LLC. in 22900 LYDEN DRIVE, ESTERO, FL 33928 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341228898.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ranch Stucco and Masonry LLC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ranch Stucco and Masonry LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
22900 LYDEN DRIVE
City
ESTERO
State
FL
ZIP
33928
Mailing
PO BOX 30562, HOUSTON, TX 77249
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
14
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  a.  At the jobsite, the tubular framed walkthrough type scaffolding had 3 boards of planking that covered approximately 28 inches between the uprights leaving an area approximately 11 inches wide without planking, exposing an employee to a 6 foot 11 inch fall hazard, on or about 2/3/16.  b.  At the jobsite, the folding trestle type scaffolding had a single board of planking that covered approximately 9-1/4 inches between the framing legs leaving an area approximately 16 inches wide without planking, exposing employees to a 5 foot fall hazard, on or about 2/3/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4200
  • · Z (S) $4200

1926.451 B03 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(3)(ii): The maximum distance from the face for plastering and lathing operations shall be 18 inches (46 cm):  a.  At the jobsite, the planking on the folding trestle type scaffolding was 25 inches from the face of the building where employees were applying plaster, exposing employees to a 5 foot fall hazard, on or about 2/3/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(ii): Unstable objects were used to support scaffolds or platform units:  a.  At the jobsite, wood boards and pieces of concrete were used to support the legs of the folding trestle type scaffolding employees were working from, exposing employees to a 5 foot fall hazard, on or about 2/3/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.452 N01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(n)(1): Scaffold platforms shall not be placed any higher than the second highest rung or step of the ladder supporting the platform:  a.  At the jobsite, planking on the folding trestle type scaffolding was placed on the top rung, exposing employees to a 6 foot fall hazard, on or about 2/3/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
Mar 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:  a.  At the jobsite, untrained employees erected and moved tubular framed walkthrough scaffolding and folding trestle type scaffolding without the supervision of a competent person, exposing employees to fall hazards between 5 & 7 feet, on or about 2/3/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4200

1926.454 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
Mar 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  a.  At the jobsite, employees working from scaffolding were not trained regarding the recognition of hazards associated with scaffolding and how to control those hazards, exposing the employees to a fall hazard between 5 and 7 feet, on or about 2/3/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341228898.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.