Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: STUCCO JOHN, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STUCCO JOHN, INC. in LOT 13, BLOCK JJ PHASE 2B, SANTA ROSA BEACH, FL 32459 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 341230456.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Stucco John, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Stucco John, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
STUCCO JOHN, INC.
Site address
LOT 13, BLOCK JJ PHASE 2B
City
SANTA ROSA BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
32459
Mailing
150 LYNN DRIVE, SANTA ROSA BEACH, FL 32439
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a.  On or about February 2, 2016, on the north west side of a new residential construction, an employee working beneath an employee applying stucco from a five buck scaffold was not wearing a hard hat, exposing the employee to the hazard of being struck by falling debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.451 B03

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(3): Where guardrails were not installed along the front edge of the platform or all employees were not protected from falling with the use of personal fall arrest systems, the front edge of the scaffold platform during plastering and lathing operations:   a.   On or about February 2, 2016 on the south west side of a new construction residential house, an employee applying stucco material to the facing of the house was not protected from a 20 feet 6 inch fall hazard by the use of a personal fall arrest system.  b.   On or about February 2, 2016 on the north west side of a new construction residential house, an employee applying stucco material to the facing of the house was not protected from a 13 feet 7 inch fall hazard by the use of a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide:  a.  On or about February 2, 2015 on the south west side of a new residential house, an employee applying stucco to the surface of the house was using a scaffold that that had platforms that were not at least 18 inches wide, exposing employees to a 20 feet 6 inch fall hazard.  b.  On or about February 2, 2016 on the north west side of a new residential house, an employee applying stucco to the surface of the house was using a scaffold that that had platforms that were not at least 18 inches wide, exposing employees to a 13 feet 7 inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): Where scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers, stairway-type ladders, ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used for access:  a.  On or about February 2, 2016 on the west side of a new residential house, three employees working on a five buck frame scaffold did not use a ladder to access the scaffold, exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  a.   On or about February 2, 2016 on the west side of a new residential house, the employer did not ensure employees applying stucco to the face of the house were using a scaffold that was inspected prior to its use for it's structural integrity, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 V

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(v): Each employee on a walkway located within a scaffold was not protected by a guardrail system (with a minimum 200 pound toprail capacity) installed within 9.5 inches (24.1 cm) of and along at least one side of the walkway:  a.  On or about February 2, 2015 on the south west side of a new residential house, an employee applying stucco to the surface of the house was using a scaffold that that had guardrails installed with a 12 inch opening along the walk board on one side, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 H02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:    a.  On or about February 2, 2016 on the north west side of a new residential house, employees working on a five buck frame scaffold did not use toeboards on the edges, exposing employees working underneath to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Stucco John, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341230456.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.