JACKSON, MS ·
OSHA Inspection: STANTON BODY SHOP & WRECKER SERVICE, LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of STANTON BODY SHOP & WRECKER SERVICE, LLC in 2691 LIVINGSTON ROAD, JACKSON, MS 39213 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 341231207.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STANTON BODY SHOP & WRECKER SERVICE, LLC
- Site address
- 2691 LIVINGSTON ROAD
- City
- JACKSON
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39213
- Mailing
- 2691 LIVINGSTON ROAD, JACKSON, MS 39213
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a). Facility - On or about February 4, 2016 employees using 3M respirators without the benefit of a written respirator program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) Facility - On or about February 4, 2016 an employee using 3M Dual Cartridge respirator without a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to safely use the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) Facility - On or about February 4, 2016 the employer had not developed a written hazard communication program for the employees using hazardous chemicals such as filler, paints, etc.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): (a) Facility - On or about February 4, 2016 the employer did conduct a hazard assessment of the workplace to determine the need for personal protective equipment such as but not limited to eye and face protection, respiratory protection, etc.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341231207.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.