Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: GALASSO TRUCKING & RIGGING, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GALASSO TRUCKING & RIGGING, INC. in 60 HUDSON ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 341231868.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Galasso Trucking & Rigging, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Galasso Trucking & Rigging, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
60 HUDSON ST
City
NEW YORK
State
NY
ZIP
10013
Mailing
2 GALASSO PL, MASPETH, NY 11378
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238910
Employees
115
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1400 F

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2016
Abate by
Aug 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $11,224 · Current $11,224
29 CFR 1926.1400(f): The employer did not establish, effectively communicate to the relevant persons, or enforce, work rules to ensure compliance with those provisions of the Standard the direct an operator, crewmember, or other employee to take certain actions:    a) 60 Hudson St on the Worth St side:   On or about February 5, 2016  The employer did not have any procedure or policy to ensure that the specific provisions of Subpart CC were being met when engaged in activities such as but not limited to, operating the crane in accordance with the manufacturers procedures regarding wind, ice and snow. Employees were thereby exposed to hazards associated with crane failure.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $11224
  • · C (S) $11224
  • · Z (S) $11224

1926.1417 N

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2016
Abate by
Aug 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1417(n): The competent person must adjust the equipment and/or operations to address the effect of wind, ice, and snow on equipment stability and rated capacity.  a) 60 Hudson St on the Worth St side:   On or about February 5, 2016  The operator and competent person did not adjust the operations to address wind and snow.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1417 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 3, 2016
Abate by
Aug 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $11,224 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1417(a): The employer did not comply with all manufacturer procedures applicable to the operational functions of equipment, including its use with attachments.  a) 60 Hudson St on the Worth St side:   On or about February 5, 2016  The manufacturers procedures were not followed because the boom angle was lowered below 75 degrees to 69.4 degrees.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $11224
  • · Z (S) $11224

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341231868.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.