Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: COASTAL PROCESSING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COASTAL PROCESSING, LLC in 1670 FORSTMANN RD, LOUISVILLE, GA 30434 (NAICS 311615). OSHA activity number 341233161.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Coastal Processing, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Coastal Processing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1670 FORSTMANN RD
City
LOUISVILLE
State
GA
ZIP
30434
Mailing
1670 FORSTMANN RD, LOUISVILLE, GA 30434
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311615
Employees
130
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2016
Abate by
Jun 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,340 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): Where wet processes were used, drainage was not maintained, and false floors, platforms, mats, or other dry standing places were not provided when practicable.    a) Shipping Department, on or about February 02, 2016, the employer did not ensure that the floor surfaces were kept free of ice and water accumulations, exposing employees to slip and fall hazards.                                                                                                                                            b)  Re-kill Area, on or about February 02, 2016, the employer did not ensure that the floor surfaces were kept free of chicken blood and feather accumulations, exposing employees to slip and fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2340
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.36 G01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2016
Abate by
Jul 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,400 · Current $3,510 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(1): The ceiling of an exit route was not at least seven feet six inches (2.3 m) high and/or any projection from the ceiling reached a point less than six feet eight inches (2.0 m) from the floor:    a)  At the facility, on or about and at times prior to, February 2, 2016, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from struck-by and laceration hazards in that adequate headroom was not provided along the following egress routes;      1. North side of Re-Kill area before the chicken necks were cut, the conveyor rail was only 4 feet above the floor.      2. East end of Re-Kill area, the opening under the moving conveyor where the chicken was transported after de-head was 5 feet above the floor.    3. South conveyor line near the Re-Kill area, the opening under the moving conveyor where the chicken is transported after de-head was 5 feet above the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3510
  • · Z (S) $5400

1910.36 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2016
Abate by
Jul 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2): Exit access(es) were not at least 28 inches (71.1 cm) wide at all points:  a) Re-Kill area, on or about and times prior to February 02 2016, the walkway leading to the exit was approximately 20 inches wide, thus exposing employees to life safety hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,400 · Current $3,510 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    a) Re-kill area, on or about February 2, 2016, employees required to cut the heads off of chickens do not wear eyes and face protection, thus exposing employees to eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3510
  • · Z (S) $5400

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2016
Abate by
Jun 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $4,095 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:       a) At the facility, on or about February 03, 2016, for employees who clean equipment and perform maintenance, the employer did not develop equipment specific written lockout procedures  that detailed the lockout requirements for equipment such as but not limited to the killer-15 machine and the picking shackle washer, exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4095
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 130 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2016
Abate by
Jun 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) Throughout the facility, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program for employees who were exposed to various hazardous chemicals including but not limited to anhydrous ammonia and sanitizing chemicals, resulting in a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Coastal Processing, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341233161.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.