Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MARIO JUAREZ-HERNANDEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARIO JUAREZ-HERNANDEZ in 314 BRAMLETT BULIVARD, OXFORD, MS 38655 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341233997.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mario Juarez-Hernandez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mario Juarez-Hernandez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
314 BRAMLETT BULIVARD
City
OXFORD
State
MS
ZIP
38655
Mailing
30 COUNTY ROAD 277, OXFORD, MS 38655
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
140
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2016
Abate by
Jun 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $4,500
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  (a) Front of Building - On or about February 3, 2016, employees working on a second level unfinished wood deck lacked head protection when working beneath employees using power tools and other tools to build a third level covering for the second floor deck.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4500

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2016
Abate by
Jun 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  (a) Front of Building - On or about February 3, 2016 employees were not wearing eye or face protection while using  pneumatic air guns loaded with 16D 3 and 1/2 inch nails to attach a wood plate against the building.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.304 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2016
Abate by
Jun 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1926.304(d): Each portable, power-driven circular saw withdrawn from the work did not automatically and instantly return the lower guard to the covering position of the saw.  (a) Front of Building - On or about February 3, 2016 employee using the Makita circular saw was cutting wood with the guard wedged in the open position thereby preventing it from automatically and instantly returning to the covered position of the saw.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6300

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2016
Abate by
Jun 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   (a) Front of Building - On or about February 3, 2016 an employee building an elevated wood deck without fall protection was exposed to a 12 foot 3 inch fall hazard.    (b) Front of Building - On or about February 3, 2016 two employees were exposed to a 23 foot and 6 inch fall hazard while mounting a wood ledger to the frame of the house above a lower level deck.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6300

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 31, 2016
Abate by
Jun 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $4,500
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:  (a) Front of Building - On or about February 3, 2016 no safe means of access/egress was provided for employees working on an upper level unfinished wood covering that was 11 feet 3 inches above an unfinished second floor deck and 26 feet 6 inches above ground.  Two employees were observed mounting a ledger to the frame of the house from the unfinished wood covering.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4500

View Mario Juarez-Hernandez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341233997.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.