Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: BECK MOTORS INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BECK MOTORS INC. in 305 N. HWY 63, FREEBURG, MO 65035 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 341238632.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Beck Motors INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Beck Motors INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BECK MOTORS INC.
Site address
305 N. HWY 63
City
FREEBURG
State
MO
ZIP
65035
Mailing
305 N. HWY 63, FREEBURG, MO 65035
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811111
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2016
Abate by
Mar 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a) At 305 N Highway 63 in Freeburg, MO 65035 (Body Shop) - On or about 02/09/2016, the employer failed to ensure that employees required to use tightfitting half-face air-purifying respirators ((APR) organic vapor cartridges), and supplied-air respirators (SAR), passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2016
Abate by
Mar 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a) At 305 N Highway 63 in Freeburg, MO 65035 (Body Shop) - On or about 02/09/2016, the employer failed to ensure that employees required to use tightfitting half-face air-purifying respirators ((APR) organic vapor cartridges), and supplied-air respirators (SAR), were fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2016
Abate by
Mar 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  a) At 305 N Highway 63 in Freeburg, MO 65035 (Body Shop) - On or about 02/09/2016, employees required to use tightfitting half-face air-purifying respirators ((APR) organic vapor cartridges), and supplied-air respirators (SAR), had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with the valve function.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2016
Abate by
Mar 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(5): Respiratory protection retraining was not conducted annually:  a) At 305 N Highway 63 in Freeburg, MO 65035 (Body Shop) - On or about 02/09/2016, the employer failed to ensure that employees incorporated in the respiratory protection program and required to use tightfitting half-face air-purifying respirators ((APR) organic vapor cartridges), and supplied-air respirators (SAR), received respiratory protection retraining annually.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2016
Abate by
Mar 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:  a) At 305 N Highway 63 in Freeburg, MO 65035 (Maintenance)  On or about 02/09/2016, employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck-by shattered abrasive wheel parts where a "DEWALT" (Model: DW758; S/N: 200135-YL0434; Type 1 - 3600rpm) heavy duty bench grinder had an opening of approximately three eighths of an inch between the work rest and abrasive wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $600
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2016
Abate by
Mar 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  a) At 305 N Highway 63 in Freeburg, MO 65035 (Maintenance)  On or about 02/09/2016, employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck-by shattered abrasive wheel parts where a "DEWALT" (Model: DW758; S/N: 200135-YL0434; Type 1 - 3600rpm) heavy duty bench grinder had an opening of approximately one half inch between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $600
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2016
Abate by
Mar 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) At 305 N Highway 63 in Freeburg, MO 65035 (Body Shop) - On or about 02/09/2016, where employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals, the employer failed to develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $200
  • · Z (O) $400

View Beck Motors INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341238632.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.