Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: NORTH ALAMO WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of NORTH ALAMO WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION in 420 S. DOOLITTLE ROAD, EDINBURG, TX 78539 (NAICS 221310). OSHA activity number 341259315.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch North Alamo Water Supply Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for North Alamo Water Supply Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
420 S. DOOLITTLE ROAD
City
EDINBURG
State
TX
ZIP
78539
Mailing
420 S. DOOLITTLE ROAD, EDINBURG, TX 78539
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
221310
Employees
112
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,825 · Current $3,121 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees who were exposed to struck-by falling loads:      Employee used a 3 Ton Hoist to lift 1 ton round chlorine cylinders, the hoist leaking hydraulic fluid, and chain was corroded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3121
  • · Z (S) $3825

1910.119 E05

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer did not establish a system to promptly address the PHA team's findings and recommendations     The employer did not promptly address the findings and recommendations contained in the 2010 date process hazard analysis to assure that they were resolved in a timely manner.   As of  February 18, 2016 date the PHAs findings and recommendations addressing the installation of chlorine detectors in the chlorine injection room had not been completed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:      At this location employer did not medically evaluate employees prior to use of full face supplied air. employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2500
  • · Z (S) $3060

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:   At this location employees required to use a tight-fitting respirator were not provided with a written respiratory protection program and exposed employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2016
Abate by
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:   At this location employees required to use a tight-fitting respirator were not annually fit tested and were exposed employees to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:        A this job site employees working with chlorine, anhydrous ammonia, and caustic in the chemical injection room were not were not provided with an adequate emergency safety shower and eyewash exposed employees to corrosive chemicals at the following locations:     a) North end of chemical injection area  b) South end of chemical injection area
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2500
  • · Z (S) $3060

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341259315.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.