Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: INDUSTRIAL CONCRETE, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of INDUSTRIAL CONCRETE, INC. in 450 T CORROSION LOOP MCAS, BEAUFORT, SC 29904 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 341265700.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Industrial Concrete, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Industrial Concrete, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
450 T CORROSION LOOP MCAS
City
BEAUFORT
State
SC
ZIP
29904
Mailing
125 B INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, FREDERICKSBURG, VA 22408
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238110
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2016
Abate by
Apr 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,120 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii):     The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace, including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:    (a) The employer did not estimate or measure employees' exposure to respirable dust containing silica generated during the grinding of raised seams in poured concrete structures. Employees voluntarily wore disposable filtering facepiece respirators.     Note: Personal air monitoring is the most accurate way of obtaining employee exposure information.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.51 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2016
Abate by
Apr 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.51(f)(1): The employer did not provide adequate washing facilities for employees engaged in the application of paints, coatings, herbicides, or insecticides, or in other operations where contaminants may be harmful to the employees.  Such facilities were not in near proximity to the worksite and was not equipped as to enable employees to remove such substances:    (a)  Adequate washing facilities were not provided for employees who were engaged in concrete pouring and finishing at the job site. Lack of washing facilities could result in employees receiving chemical burns to the skin. Potable water was available through water hoses at the site, but soap and hand towels were not provided.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2016
Abate by
Apr 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a) The employer did not maintain a copy of their written hazard communication program at the worksite where employees were potentially exposed to wet concrete, diesel fuel, gasoline and respirable dust containing silica.     ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2016
Abate by
Apr 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:      (a) As of February 17, 2016, the employer had not trained employees who were potentially exposed to gasoline, diesel fuel, concrete, and respirable dust containing silica on the new chemical container label elements and the new format and types of information on each section of safety data sheets (SDSs).      ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Industrial Concrete, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341265700.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.