CHICAGO, IL —
OSHA Inspection: BAKE'S STEEL ERECTORS, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BAKE'S STEEL ERECTORS, INC. in 1060 W ADDISON, CHICAGO, IL 60613 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 341267474.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BAKE'S STEEL ERECTORS, INC.
- Site address
- 1060 W ADDISON
- City
- CHICAGO
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60613
- Mailing
- 33243 N. HIGHWAY 45, GRAYSLAKE, IL 60030
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238120
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.62 D02 V A
- Issued
- May 9, 2016
- Abate by
- May 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $7,140
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(A): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and documented that employee(s) performing any of the tasks listed in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(iv) were not exposed to lead in excess of 2,500 micrograms per cubic meter, 50 times the Permissible Exposure Limit, the employer did not treat the employee(s) as if the employee(s) were exposed to lead in excess of 2,500 micrograms per meter cubed, and did not implement employee protective measures as prescribed in 29 CFR 1926.62.(d)(2)(v): On or about November 14 and 15, 2015 and February 12, 2016, prior to documenting the initial exposure assessment that employees were not exposed to lead in excess of 2500 micrograms per cubic meter, the employer treated its employees as if the employees were exposed to airborne lead concentrations up to 500 micrograms per cubic meter instead of 2,500 micrograms per cubic meter where employees were torch cutting steel that potentially contained residual lead based paint of up to 0.06% by weight.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $7140
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1926.62 F01 IV
- Issued
- May 9, 2016
- Abate by
- May 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(f)(1)(iv): Appropriate respiratory protection was not used during periods when respirators were required to provide interim protection for employees while they performed the operations specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2): a) On or about November 16, 2015, Bake's Steel Erectors, Inc. did not provide employees performing torch cutting in the A-Line area with appropriate respiratory protection such as a half-mask, powered air-purifying respirator or a full-face, air purifying respirator as interim protection when an employee exposure assessment had not been conducted. b) On February 22, 2016, employees of Bake's Steel Erectors, Inc. did not provide employees performing torch cutting and welding in the truss area with appropriate respiratory protection such as a half-mask, powered air-purifying respirator or a full-face, air purifying respirator as interim protection when an employee exposure assessment had not been conducted. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 N01 II E
- Issued
- May 9, 2016
- Abate by
- May 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $700
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(n)(1)(ii)(E): Exposure monitoring records did not include the environmental variables that could affect the measurement of employee exposure: a) On November 16, 2015, Bake's Steel Erectors, Inc. did not ensure that the exposure monitoring record included the environmental variables that could affect the measurement of employee exposures. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $700
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1926.62 D02 V B
- Issued
- May 9, 2016
- Abate by
- May 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(B): Appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment in accordance with paragraph (g) of this section. a) On or about November 16, 2015, Bake's Steel Erectors, Inc. did not ensure employees used appropriate personal protective clothing during torch cutting operations in the A-line area when no employee exposure assessment had been performed. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1926.62 G01
- Issued
- May 9, 2016
- Abate by
- May 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(g)(1): Where employees were exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit, without regard to the use of respirators; where employees were exposed to lead compounds which may cause skin or eye irritation (e.g. lead arsenate, lead azide); and as interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2), the employer did not ensure that each employee used appropriate protective work clothing and equipment that prevented contamination of the employee and the employee's garments: a) On or about November 16, 2015, Bake's Steel Erectors, Inc. did not ensure employees used appropriate personal protective clothing during torch cutting operations in the A-line area when no employee exposure assessment had been performed. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V C
- Issued
- May 9, 2016
- Abate by
- May 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(C): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with change areas in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2): a) On or about February 15, 2016, Bake's Steel Erectors, Inc. did not provide employees with appropriate change areas during welding and torch cutting operations in the truss area when an employee exposure assessment had not been performed. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $3500
1926.62 I02 I
- Issued
- May 9, 2016
- Abate by
- May 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2)(i): The employer did not provide clean change areas as an interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2), without regard to the use of respirators: a) On or about February 15, 2016, Bake's Steel Erectors, Inc. did not provide employees with appropriate change areas during welding and torch cutting operations in the truss area when an employee exposure assessment had not been performed. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 N01 II C
- Issued
- May 9, 2016
- Abate by
- May 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(n)(1)(ii)(C): Exposure monitoring records did not include the type of respiratory devices worn. a) On November 16, 2015, Bake's Steel Erectors, Inc. did not ensure that the exposure monitoring record included the type of respiratory protection used by employees when the employee exposure assessment was conducted. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $700
- — Z (O) $700
1926.62 N01 II D
- Issued
- May 9, 2016
- Abate by
- May 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(n)(1)(ii)(D): Exposure monitoring records did not include the name and job classification of the employee(s) monitored and of all other employees whose exposure the measurement was intended to represent: a) On November 16, 2015, Bake's Steel Erectors, Inc. did not ensure that the exposure monitoring record included the job classification of the employee(s) when the employee exposure assessment was conducted. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Bake'S Steel Erectors, INC.
View Bake'S Steel Erectors, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238120)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341267474.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.