Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: EDGARDO ALEXANDER A CORTEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDGARDO ALEXANDER A CORTEZ in 14011 PERMSIMMON COVE, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78245 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341275428.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Edgardo Alexander a Cortez for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Edgardo Alexander a Cortez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
14011 PERMSIMMON COVE
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78245
Mailing
1252 KEATS ST., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78211
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
1
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2016
Abate by
Apr 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:       The side of the residential home under construction, south: On or about February 23, 2016, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet while installing drip edge metal trim on the outside of a residential home without being trained on fall hazard recognition.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $500
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):       The side of the residential home under construction, south: On or about February 23, 2016, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet while installing drip edge metal trim on the outside of a residential home.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:       The side of the residential home under construction, west: On or about February 23, 2016, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet, while using a 16 foot extension ladder to access the building roof that had the side rails approximately 13 inches beyond the landing, to install drip edge metal trim on the outside of a residential home.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $500
  • · Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341275428.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.