Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CITY PLATING AND METAL FINISHING, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of CITY PLATING AND METAL FINISHING, LLC in 11511 REVERIE LN., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78216 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 341278364.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch City Plating and Metal Finishing, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for City Plating and Metal Finishing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11511 REVERIE LN.
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78216
Mailing
11511 REVERIE LN., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78216
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
19
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.215 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2016
Abate by
Sep 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(1): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not used with safety guard(s):    a) Polishing Room, Polisher C: On or about February 23, 2016, and times prior thereto, employees performing metal polishing tasks were exposed to struck-by hazards from the use of abrasive wheels on polishing machinery (make and model unknown) which were missing wheel guards.    b) Polishing Room, Polisher D: On or about February 23, 2016, and times prior thereto, employees performing metal polishing tasks were exposed to struck-by hazards from the use of abrasive wheels on polishing machinery (make and model unknown) which were missing wheel guards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2016
Abate by
Jul 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:    a) Polishing Room Entrance, Polisher A: On or about February 23, 2016, and times prior thereto, employees were exposed to caught-in hazards from unguarded rotating parts while using three adjacent polishing machines (make and model unknown) that had exposed rotating shafts.    b)Polishing Room, L'Hommdieu #2:  On or about February 23, 2016, and times prior thereto, employees were exposed to caught-in hazards from unguarded rotating parts while using a L'Hommdieu plating and polishing machine (Model #305, SN: L 84102) that had an exposed rotating shaft.    c) Polsihing Room, L'Hommedieu #1: On or about February 23, 2016, and times prior thereto, employees were exposed to caught-in hazards from unguarded rotating parts while using a L'Hommdieu plating and polishing machine (model and serial number unknown) that had an exposed rotating shaft.    d) Polishing Room, Polisher B: On or about February 23, 2016, and times prior thereto, employees were exposed to caught-in hazards from unguarded rotating parts while using a polishing machine (make and model unknown) that had an exposed rotating shaft.    e) Polishing Room, Polisher C: On or about February 23, 2016, and times prior thereto, employees were exposed to caught-in hazards from unguarded rotating parts while using a polishing machine (make and model unknown) that had an exposed rotating shaft.    f) Polishing Room, Polisher D: On or about February 23, 2016, and times prior thereto, employees were exposed to caught-in hazards from unguarded rotating parts while using a polishing machine (make and model unknown) that had an exposed rotating shaft.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2016
Abate by
Jul 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    Paint Room: On or about February 25, 2016, and times prior there to, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while using compressed air at pressures greater than 30 p.s.i. to prep and clean debris from metal parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 F05

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2016
Abate by
Jul 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:    a) Stripping area: On or about February 25, 2016, and times prior there to, employees were exposed to chemical hazards from a 20-gallon container of "Stripper" that was not properly labeled to include chemical names and information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.    b) Stripping area: On or about February 25, 2016, and times prior there to, employees were exposed to chemical hazards from a 5-gallon container of "Hydrochloric Acid" that was not properly labeled to include chemical names and information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.    c) Stripping area: On or about February 25, 2016, and times prior there to, employees were exposed to chemical hazards from two 55-gallon containers of "Hydrochloric Acid" that were not properly labeled to include chemical names and information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.    d) Stripping area: On or about February 25, 2016, and times prior there to, employees were exposed to chemical hazards from two approximately 55-gallon containers of "Nitric Acid" that were not properly labeled to include chemical names and information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.    e) Stripping area: On or about February 25, 2016, and times prior there to, employees were exposed to chemical hazards from an approximately 55-gallon container of "Gold Stripper" that was not properly labeled to include chemical names and information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.134 G01 I A

Other-than-serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2016
Abate by
Jul 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  a) Polsihing Room: On or about February 23, 2016, the employer did not ensure that employee(s) who were required to wear tight-fitting, N-95 respirators while performing metal polishing tasks were free of facial hair between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face.  b) Paint Room: On or about February 25, 2016, the employer did not ensure that employee(s) who were required to wear tight-fitting, half-mask respirators while performing spray paint tasks were free of facial hair between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1026 H02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2016
Abate by
Jul 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1026(h)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that employees removed all protective clothing and equipment contaminated with chromium (VI) at the end of the work shift or at the completion of their tasks involving chromium (VI) exposure, whichever came first:  Plating Room: On or about February 23, 2016, and times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that employees who perform Chromium (VI) electroplating processes removed contaminated personal protective clothing when work was completed, exposing employees to Chromium (VI) hazards from skin contact and inhalation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341278364.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.