Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: KINGPIN TATTOO SUPPLY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KINGPIN TATTOO SUPPLY, INC. in 9715 INTERNATIONAL CT N, SAINT PETERSBURG, FL 33716 (NAICS 423450). OSHA activity number 341283943.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Kingpin Tattoo Supply, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kingpin Tattoo Supply, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9715 INTERNATIONAL CT N
City
SAINT PETERSBURG
State
FL
ZIP
33716
Mailing
9715 INTERNATIONAL CT N, SAINT PETERSBURG, FL 33716
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423450
Employees
35
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks:  a.  For employees assigned to operate fork lifts as part of their tasks as observed on or about 02/25/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.37 B04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent:   a.  At the main warehouse,  direction of travel was not clear nor immediately apparent.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.37 B05

Other-than-serious 4 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet):  a.  At the main warehouse, 4 doors not meant for employee discharge located in the north side of the warehouse were not marked as "Not an Exit", as observed on or about 02/26/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a.  For employees engaged in storage and distribution of substances such as but not limited to tattoo inks, medical disinfectants  and cleaners.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Mar 11, 2016
Abate by
Mar 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a.  For employees engaged in storage and distribution of substances such as but not limited to tattoo inks, medical disinfectants  and cleaners.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341283943.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.