Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-29

OSHA Inspection: CROSSGATES FAMILY DOCTORS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CROSSGATES FAMILY DOCTORS in 395 CROSSGATES BLVD. SUITE 102, BRANDON, MS 39042 (NAICS 621111). OSHA activity number 341290732.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Crossgates Family Doctors — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Crossgates Family Doctors is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
395 CROSSGATES BLVD. SUITE 102
City
BRANDON
State
MS
ZIP
39042
Mailing
P.O. BOX 16930, JACKSON, MS 39236
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621111
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 G02 II B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2016
Abate by
May 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(B): The employer did not ensure that the required training was provided to employees with occupational exposure at least annually:    (a) Jobsite - On or about February 29, 2016 employees with occupational exposure were not trained annually. The employer trained employees upon initial hire only.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1030 G02 VII A

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2016
Abate by
May 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(A): The bloodborne pathogens training program did not contain an accessible copy of the regulatory text of this standard and an explanation of its contents:  (a) Jobsite - On or about February 29, 2016 the training program did not include a copy of the standard and an explanation of its contents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 G02 VII N

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2016
Abate by
May 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(N): The blood borne pathogens training program did not contain an opportunity for interactive questions or answers with the person conducting the training session:  (a) Jobsite - On or about February 29, 2016 the blood borne pathogen training program did not afford employees and opportunity to ask question, the training only consisted of the employees reading the material and signing a statement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 H02 I

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2016
Abate by
May 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(2)(i): The employer's records for annual bloodborne pathogen training did not include all of the elements required by (h)(2)(i)(A)-(D) of 29 CFR 1910.1030:  (a) Jobsite - On or about February 29, 2016 the employer's records did not include the contents or a summary of the training session; the names and qualifications of the persons conducting the training; and the names and job titles of all persons attending the training sessions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2016
Abate by
May 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a) Jobsite - On or about February 29, 2016 a written hazard communication program was not developed or implemented.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1030 F01 II A

Other-than-serious 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2016
Abate by
May 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(ii)(A): The employer did not ensure that medical evaluations and procedures including the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series, post-exposure evaluation, or follow-up, including prophylaxis, were made available at no cost to the employee:  (a) Jobsite - On or about January 29, 2016 employees were required to sign away their rights to receive the hepatitis B vaccine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1030 F02 IV

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2016
Abate by
May 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(iv): The employer did not ensure that employees who declined to accept the hepatitis B vaccination offered by the employer signed the statement in appendix A:  (a) Jobsite - On or about January 29, 2016 employees with occupational exposure did not sign the declination statement in appendix A.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Crossgates Family Doctors's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341290732.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.