RUFUS, OR ·
OSHA Inspection: ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN DAY DAM
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN DAY DAM in JOHN DAY DAM, RUFUS, OR 97050 (NAICS 221111). OSHA activity number 341291714.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN DAY DAM
- Site address
- JOHN DAY DAM
- City
- RUFUS
- State
- OR
- ZIP
- 97050
- Mailing
- P.O BOX 823, RUFUS, OR 97050
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 221111
- Employees
- 125
- Ownership type
- Federal government (D)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 G01 II
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(ii): Corrective glasses, goggles or other personal protective equipment were worn in a manner that interfered with the seal of the respirator facepiece: (a) Located at turbine pit #8 during lead abatement work: The inspection revealed potential exposure to lead because the employer did not ensure that a head covering worn by the employee did not interfere with the seal of the respirator.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1025 D07
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 27, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(7): Additional exposure monitoring was not conducted when there was a change in production, process, control or personnel, or any other reason to suspect a change that may have resulted in new or additional exposure to lead: (a) Located at the John Day dam in Rufus, Oregon: On or about and at times prior to March 7, 2016 the inspection revealed that the Army Corps of Engineers did not conduct additional exposure monitoring to determine employee exposure to lead when using a different configuration for containment and ventilation during lead abatement activities in the main unit 4 turbine pit.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1025 E03 II
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 27, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(ii): Written compliance programs for lead did not include the required sections: On or about and at times prior to March 7, 2016: The inspection revealed that the written compliance program for lead did not include the following components: (a) A description of each operation in which lead is emitted (b) A description of the specific means that will be employed to achieve compliance, including engineering plans and studies used to determine methods selected for controlling exposures to lead (c) A detailed schedule for implementation of the program
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1025 E04 I
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(4)(i): When ventilation was used to control exposure to lead, measurements of the system's effectiveness were not conducted within five days of a change in production, process, or control which could result in a change in employee exposure: (a) Located in turbine pits #4 and #8: On or about and at times prior to March 7, 2016 the inspection revealed that employees were potentially exposed to serious health effects due to the failure to determine the effectiveness of ventilation within the containment area set up for lead abatement activities.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1025 H01
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 27, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: (a) Located in turbine pit #4: On or about and at times prior to February 23, 2016 the inspection revealed that the level of lead on the stairway was over 22 times the level for floors allowed by the EPA after lead abatement activities.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections at Army Corps of Engineers, John DAY DAM
View Army Corps of Engineers, John DAY DAM's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 221111)
More inspections in OR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341291714.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.