Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: EIKON PARTNERS

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of EIKON PARTNERS in 3360 MOUNTAIN DRIVE, DECATUR, GA 30032 (NAICS 531390). OSHA activity number 341294478.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Eikon Partners for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eikon Partners is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EIKON PARTNERS
Site address
3360 MOUNTAIN DRIVE
City
DECATUR
State
GA
ZIP
30032
Mailing
133 JOHNSON FERRY RD. SUITE 115, MARIETTA, GA 30068
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
531390
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1101 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 10, 2016
Abate by
Sep 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,564 · Current $2,673 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(1): Operations covered by this standard, other than Class I, II, and III work, in which airborne concentrations of asbestos exceeded, or where there was a reasonable possibility they could exceed the permissible exposure limit (PEL), were not conducted within a regulated area:  3600 Mountain Drive, Decatur, GA - Employees were performing demolition, clean-up, and disposal of a multi-family residential apartment complex which contained approximately 4% Chrysotile.   A regulated area was not established which also would include any adjoining areas where debris and waste from asbestos work accumulates or where airborne concentrations of asbestos exceed, or can possibly exceed the PEL. Only persons permitted by an employer and required by work duties to be present in regulated areas may enter a regulated area. The designated competent person supervises all asbestos work performed in this area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2673
  • · Z (S) $3564

1926.1101 E02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 10, 2016
Abate by
Sep 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,564 · Current $2,673 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9933

29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(2): Signs were not provided and displayed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(7) :  3600 Mountain Drive, Decatur, GA - Employees were performing demolition, clean-up, and disposal of a multi-family residential apartment complex which contained approximately 4% Chrysotile.  Signs or labels were not posted in a manner that minimized the amount of people in the area and protect the people outside of the area from exposure to airborne asbestos.  Posted warning signs demarcating the area must be easily readable and understandable. The signs must bear the following information:  DANGER ASBESTOS CANCER AND LUNG DISEASE HAZARD AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY RESPIRATORY AND PROTECTIVE CLOTHING ARE REQUIRED IN THIS AREA   In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2673
  • · Z (S) $3564

1926.1101 I01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 10, 2016
Abate by
Sep 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,564 · Current $2,673 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(i)(1): The employer did not provide and require the use of protective clothing, such as coveralls or similar whole-body clothing, head coverings, gloves, and foot coverings for each employee exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos that exceed the time weighted average and/or excursion limit in 29 CFR 1926.1101(c) or for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced:  3600 Mountain Drive, Decatur, GA - Employees were performing demolition, clean-up, and disposal of a multi-family residential apartment complex which contained approximately 4% Chrysotile in the ceiling texture.   Personal protective equipment was not provided or required while the conducting the above task, which is classified as Class I and/or Class II asbestos work, without a negative exposure assessment.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2673
  • · Z (S) $3564

1926.1101 K01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 10, 2016
Abate by
Sep 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,564 · Current $2,673 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(1)(ii): The employer did not include asbestos in the program established to comply with the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (� 1910.1200, did not ensure that each employee had access to labels on containers of asbestos and safety data sheets, did not ensure hazard communication training on asbestos in accordance with the provisions of the Hazard Communication Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200 as well as paragraphs (k)(9) and (10) of this section. The employer did not provide information on at least the following hazards: Cancer and lung effects.   3600 Mountain Drive, Decatur, GA - Employees were performing demolition, clean-up, and disposal of a multi-family residential apartment complex which contained approximately 4% Chrysotile.   Training on the hazards of asbestos had not been conducted.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2673
  • · Z (S) $3564

1926.1101 K09 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 10, 2016
Abate by
Sep 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9933

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(i): The employer did not institute, at no cost to employees, a training program for each employee who was likely to be exposed in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL) and for each employee who performed Class I through IV asbestos operations:  3600 Mountain Drive, Decatur, GA - Employees were performing demolition, clean-up, and disposal of a multi-family residential apartment complex which contained approximately 4% Chrysotile.   The employer did not provide exposed employees an asbestos  training course covering the health effects of asbestos; and/or locations of ACM and/or recognition of ACM and PACM damage and deterioration and/or requirements in this standard related to housekeeping, and/or proper response to fiber release episodes.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K02 II C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 10, 2016
Abate by
Sep 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,564 · Current $2,673 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(2)(ii)(C): The building owner and/or facility owner did not notify all employers of employees who work within or adjacent to the areas containing asbestos containing materials (ACM) and presumed asbestos containing materials of the presence, location and quantity:  3600 Mountain Drive, Decatur, GA -  The building owner and facility owners did not exercise due diligence in to inform employers of the employees of the location and quantity of ACM and/or PACM present in the area and the precautions to be taken to insure that airborne asbestos is confined to the area.  Employees of employers were performing demolition, clean-up, and disposal of a multi-family residential apartment complex  which contained approximately 4% Chrysotile in the ceiling tile.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2673
  • · Z (S) $3564

1926.1101 K08 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 10, 2016
Abate by
Sep 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,564 · Current $2,673 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(8)(i): Labels were not affixed to all products containing asbestos and to all containers containing such products, including waste containers:  Employees were performing clean-up, and disposal of a multi-family residential apartment complex debris which contained approximately 4% Chrysotile.  The employer did not ensure that asbestos waste, scrap, debris, bags, containers, equipment, and contaminated clothing consigned for disposal was collected and disposed of in sealed, labeled, impermeable bags or other closed, labeled, impermeable containers containing asbestos fibers bearing the following information:   DANGER CONTAINS ASBESTOS FIBERS MAY CAUSE CANCER CAUSES DAMAGE TO LUNGS DO NOT BREATHE DUST AVOID CREATING DUST  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2673
  • · Z (S) $3564

1926.1101 L02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 10, 2016
Abate by
Sep 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,564 · Current $2,673 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(l)(2): Asbestos waste, scrap, debris, bags, containers, equipment, and contaminated clothing consigned for disposal was not collected and disposed of in sealed, labeled, impermeable bags or other closed, labeled, impermeable containers:  3600 Mountain Drive, Decatur, GA - Employees were performing clean-up and disposal of a multi-family residential apartment complex debris which contained approximately 4% Chrysotile.   The building owners and employers identified previously installed asbestos or PACM, and the employers did attach or post clearly noticeable and readable labels or signs to inform employees which materials contain asbestos during disposal.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2673
  • · Z (S) $3564

1926.1101 O01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 10, 2016
Abate by
Sep 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,564 · Current $2,673 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(o)(1): The employer did not designate a competent person on construction worksites, having the qualifications and authorities for ensuring worker safety and health required by 29 CFR 1926.1101(C), General Safety and Health Provisions for Construction 29 CFR 1926.20 through 29 CFR 1926.32:  3600 Mountain Drive, Decatur, GA - Employees were performing demolition, clean-up, and disposal of a multi-family residential apartment complex which contained approximately 4% Chrysotile.   On this construction site with asbestos operations, the employers did not designate a competent person, who could identify asbestos hazards in the workplace and have the authority to correct them.   In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2673
  • · Z (S) $3564

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341294478.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.