Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: TRIOAK FOODS, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of TRIOAK FOODS, INC. in 12445 COUNTY ROAD 58.5, BRANDON, CO 81071 (NAICS 311119). OSHA activity number 341295970.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Trioak Foods, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Trioak Foods, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TRIOAK FOODS, INC.
Site address
12445 COUNTY ROAD 58.5
City
BRANDON
State
CO
ZIP
81071
Mailing
12445 COUNTY ROAD 58.5, BRANDON, CO 81071
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311119
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $3,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    (a) On or about March 1, 2016, and at times prior, the employer did not provide medical evaluations for those employees required to wear a respirator.     Abatement note: Abatement certification is required for this item (See Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $3200
  • · Z (S) $4000

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    (a) On or about March 1, 2016, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that employees wearing tight fitting full face respirators were fit tested.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  (a) On or about March 1, 2016, and at times prior, the employer did not provide training in accordance with 1910.134 to each employee required to wear a respirator.      Abatement note: Abatement certification is required for this item (See Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1048 I02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2016
Abate by
Jul 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1048(i)(2): When employees' skin could have become splashed with solutions containing 1 percent or greater formaldehyde, the employer did not provide conveniently located quick drench showers and/or did not ensure that affected employees used these facilities immediately:  (a) On or about March 1, 2016, and at times prior, the employer did not provide a quick drench shower where employees are handling 300 gallon totes of formaldehyde solution.     Abatement note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (See Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $4000
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.1048 I03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2016
Abate by
May 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1048(i)(3): When there was a possibility that an employee's eyes could be splashed with solutions containing 0.1 percent or greater formaldehyde, the employer did not provide acceptable eyewash facilities within the immediate work area for emergency use:    (a) On or about March 1, 2016, and at times prior, the employer did not provide eyewashes for employees handling 300 gallon totes of formaldehyde.      Abatement note: Abatement and documentation are required for this item (See Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1048 H01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2016
Abate by
May 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $3,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1048(h)(1)(i): All contact of the eyes and skin with liquids containing 1 percent or more formaldehyde was not prevented by the use of chemical protective clothing made of material impervious to formaldehyde and the use of other personal protective equipment such as goggles and face shields, as appropriate to the operation:      (a) On or about March 1, 2016, and at times prior, the employer did not require the use of appropriate PPE for employees working with formaldehyde, including chemical protective clothing.     Abatement note: Abatement certification is required for this item (See Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $3200
  • · Z (S) $4000

1910.1048 D01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(1)(i): Employees of a workplace covered by this standard were not monitored to determine their exposure to formaldehyde: (a) On or about March 1, 2016, and at times prior, the employer did not monitor workers exposed to formaldehyde to determine whether they were exposed above the short term exposure limit (STEL).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1048 J02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2016
Abate by
Jul 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1048(j)(2): In work areas where spillage may have occurred, the employer did not make provisions to contain the spill, to decontaminate the work area, and to dispose of the waste:    (a) On or about March 1, 2016, and at times prior, the employer did not implement instructions to address a formaldehyde spill in the workplace.    Abatement note: Abatement certification is required for this item (See Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Trioak Foods, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341295970.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.