Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,547Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-01 Last loaded 2026-09-04

OSHA Inspection: JAIME MEJIA BASTIDA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JAIME MEJIA BASTIDA in 3700 BROOKSIDE PARKWAY, ALPHARETTA, GA 30022 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341302776.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jaime Mejia Bastida for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jaime Mejia Bastida is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JAIME MEJIA BASTIDA
Site address
3700 BROOKSIDE PARKWAY
City
ALPHARETTA
State
GA
ZIP
30022
Mailing
2881 PEBBLEBROOK COURT, BUFORD, GA 30518
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
10
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.502 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2): The employer did not provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for employee(s) and did not comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before employee(s) began the work that necessitates the fall protection:  (a) Fourth floor balcony, new apartment construction located at 3700 Brookside Parkway, Alpharetta, GA 30022: Employees working at heights of approximately 33-feet, 4-inches from the lower level were not provided with adequate personal fall arrest systems. One employee was wearing no fall protection and one employee was using a personal fall arrest system which was not properly anchored according to the manufacturer's recommendations and the personal fall protection system requirements under CFR 1926.502(d).
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341302776.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.