KEWANEE, IL —
OSHA Inspection: GREAT DANE LTD. PARTNERSHIP
Follow-up inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a follow-up safety inspection of GREAT DANE LTD. PARTNERSHIP in 2006 KENTVILLE RD, KEWANEE, IL 61443 (NAICS 336212). OSHA activity number 341303527.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GREAT DANE LTD. PARTNERSHIP
- Site address
- 2006 KENTVILLE RD
- City
- KEWANEE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61443
- Mailing
- 2006 KENTVILLE RD, KEWANEE, IL 61443
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Follow-up (F)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336212
- Employees
- 660
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 E01
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1): Standard railing(s) did not consist of top rail, intermediate rail and/or posts and/or did not have a vertical height of 42 inches (106.7 cm) nominal from upper surface of top rail to floor, platform runway, or ramp level: On or about March 4, 2016 Employees working on the roof bows were exposed to a fall hazard, because the platform did not have a standard railing. The top rail remained in a lowered position.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1800
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.26 C03 V
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.26(c)(3)(v): While ascending or descending, the climber did not face the ladder. On or about March 4, 2016 Employees using step ladders were exposed to a fall hazard, because the employee was not facing the ladder and maintaining three points of contact, when ascending or descending the step ladder.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1800
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to Items of this section: On or about March 7, 2016, employees were exposed to unexpected start-up or release of stored energy while performing servicing and maintenance activities on the Hydraulic Press, and the employer did not developed specific procedures that outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy. The procedures shall clearly outline: a. A specific statement of the intended use of the procedure, b. Specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy, c. Specific procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices and the responsibility for them, and d. Specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2250
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: On or about March 7, 2016, employees were exposed to unexpected start-up or release of stored energy while performing servicing and maintenance activities on the Hydraulic Press, and the employer did not conduct an annually periodic inspection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2250
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.147 C06 II
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed: On or about March 7, 2016, employees performed servicing and maintenance activities on Hydraulic Press, and the employer did not certify periodic inspection had been performed. The certification shall include identification of the machine or equipment, the date of the inspection, the employees included in the inspection, and the person performing the inspection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 III A
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(iii)(A): Retraining was not provided for authorized and affected employees when there was a change in their job assignments, a change in machines, equipment or processes that presented a new hazard, or when there was a change in the energy control procedures. On or about March 7, 2016, a maintenance employee who had returned to employment was exposed to unexpected start-up or release of stored energy while performing servicing and maintenance activities on the Hydraulic Press, and the employer did not provide retraining to ensure the employees proficiency in the energy control procedures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2250
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1) - If at any time a powered industrial truck is found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe, the truck shall be taken out of service until it has been restored to safe operating condition. On or about March 4, 2016, an employee was exposed to struck by hazards while operating a Komatsu Forklift, and was not taken out of service, until it was evaluated for safe operating condition. The Forklifts brakes needed attention.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2250
- — Z (S) $4500
More inspections at Great Dane LTD. Partnership
View Great Dane LTD. Partnership's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336212)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341303527.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.