Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MALIN CO.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MALIN CO. in 5400 SMITH RD, BROOK PARK, OH 44142 (NAICS 332618). OSHA activity number 341305563.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Malin CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Malin CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MALIN CO.
Site address
5400 SMITH RD
City
BROOK PARK
State
OH
ZIP
44142
Mailing
5400 SMITH RD, BROOK PARK, OH 44142
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332618
Employees
28
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section.    On or about March 8, 2016 employees were exposed to rotating parts when the employer did not require the utilization of machine specific energy control procedures for employees performing spooling over run recovery operations of the #5 and #6 spooling machines. The energy sources include, but are not limited to, electrical and mechanical.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d): Application of control. The established procedures for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) shall cover the following elements and actions and shall be done in the following sequence:    On or about March 8, 2016, employees were exposed to the rotating parts on Spooling machines 5 and 6 when the employer did not ensure employees performed the procedures for the application of energy control by; preparing the machine for shutdown [per the 1910.147[(d)(2)], isolating the machine of all energy sources [d)(3)], affixing lockout devices to hold the machine in the off position [(d)(4)(i)], and verifying that isolation and de-energization of the machine had been accomplished [(d)(6)], during the overrun recovery operations.  The energy sources include, but are not limited to, electrical and mechanical.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2016
Abate by
Jun 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation:    On or about March 8, 2016, employees were exposed to rotating parts when the employer did not train employees on the procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy during the over run recovery operations on spooling machines 5 and 6. The energy sources employees were exposed to include, but are not limited to, electrical and mechanical.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a) On or about February 26, 2016 employees were exposed to nip points when an employee caught his left thumb in the moving parts on brush turner #1.      b) On or about March 8, 2016 employees were exposed to rotating parts when the employer did not fully guard the rotating parts of spooling machines #5 and #6.    C) On or about March 8, 2016, employees were exposed to rotating parts when the coiler was left unguarded on the front and rear of coiling machine #2.      D) On or about March 8, 2016, employees were exposed to rotating parts when the chuck of the large brush spinner was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2016
Abate by
May 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point of operation guards were not designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of their body in the danger zone during the operating cycle:    On or about February 26, 2016, employees were exposed to point of operation hazards on brush turner #1.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4900

View Malin CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341305563.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.