TACOMA, WA ·
OSHA Inspection: U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, TACOMA POE
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, TACOMA POE in 2202 PORT OF TACOMA RD, TACOMA, WA 98421 (NAICS 928110). OSHA activity number 341306959.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, TACOMA POE
- Site address
- 2202 PORT OF TACOMA RD
- City
- TACOMA
- State
- WA
- ZIP
- 98421
- Mailing
- 2202 PORT OF TACOMA RD, TACOMA, WA 98421
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 928110
- Employees
- 53
- Ownership type
- Federal government (D)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.141 A03 I
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2016
- Abate by
- May 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(3)(i): Places of employment were not kept clean to the extent that the nature of the work allowed: a) The first floor ceiling vents had black soot caked on the vents and on the adjacent ceiling tiles.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: a) Gun Cleaning Area; A bottle of gun cleaning solvent or lubrication was not labeled.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use: a) The employer did not have safety data sheets for Tetra Gun Cleaner or Break Free CLP.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2016
- Abate by
- May 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: a) Employees had not received the hazard communication Global Harmonization training which includes 2012 program requirements, pictograms, safety data sheet layout and information.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1025 H01
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2016
- Abate by
- May 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: a) Gun Cleaning Area; There was surface lead contamination on the wooden table on which guns were cleaned. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1009466, citation number 2, item number 1B and was affirmed as a final order on March 4, 2015, with respect to a workplace located at Sumas, Washington. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 977496, citation number 1, item number 1C and was affirmed as a final order on July 2, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at Lynden, Washington. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 977497, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on July 2, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at Ferndale, Washington.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (R) $0
1904.30 A
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2016
- Abate by
- May 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.30(a): Employer did not maintain separate OSHA 300 Logs for each establishment that is expected to be in operation for one year or longer: a) The employer had multiple locations of Border Protection jobsites on one OSHA 300 log and 300A form for 2013. b) The employer had multiple locations of Border Protection jobsites on one OSHA 300 log and 300A form for 2014.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
1904.40 A
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2016
- Abate by
- May 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours: a) Copies of the OSHA 300 logs for 2013, 2014 and 2015 were not provided to the compliance officer. Copies of the 300 A summary forms were provided, but not the logs which lists employees names and types of injuries.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
1910.141 A04 II
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2016
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(4)(ii): Wastes were not collected and removed as often as necessary to maintain the place of employment in a sanitary condition: a) Office Supply Storage Area and IT Cage; Trash and haphazardly stored empty boxes had accumulated for approximately one week.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Tacoma POE
View U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Tacoma POE's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 928110)
More inspections in WA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341306959.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.