OSHA Inspection: MAINLY MONOGRAMS

Issued

Mar 22, 2016

Abate by

Apr 1, 2016

Penalty

Initial $2,100 · Current $1,575 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment  Location: Clean Dept.  a)  Employees use Safety-Kleen (petroleum distillates) to clean silk screen parts .  The employer did not require or provide protective eye equipment; on or about 3/7/16.

Issued

Mar 22, 2016

Abate by

Apr 24, 2016

Penalty

Initial $2,100 · Current $1,575 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met   Location: Workplace  Employees use hazardous chemicals such as  but not limited to Safety-Kleen(petroleum distillates) and Ink Wash ( Dimethyl glutarate) to clean silk screening equipment.  The employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program; on or about 3/7/16.

Issued

Mar 22, 2016

Abate by

Apr 24, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   Location: Workplace  Employees use hazardous chemicals such as  but not limited to Safety-Kleen (petroleum distillates) and Ink Wash ( Dimethyl glutarate) to clean silk screening equipment.  The employer did not provide hazard communication training; on or about 3/7/16.