CHAMPLAIN, NY —
OSHA Inspection: MODERN MECHANICAL FAB, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MODERN MECHANICAL FAB, INC. in 100 WALNUT ST # 8, CHAMPLAIN, NY 12919 (NAICS 423510). OSHA activity number 341308823.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MODERN MECHANICAL FAB, INC.
- Site address
- 100 WALNUT ST # 8
- City
- CHAMPLAIN
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 12919
- Mailing
- 489 ROUTE 9, CHAMPLAIN, NY 12919
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423510
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- May 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: A) Worksite - On or about March 28, 2016, an employee operating a hand grinder and a Dynafile was exposed to continuous noise levels at 91.5 dBA or 123.3 percent of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA) during the 452 minute sampling period; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 28 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1020
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- May 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: A) Worksite - On or about March 8, 2016, the employer did not establish and implement the elements of a written respiratory protection program for those employees who were voluntarily wearing Miller powered air purifying respirators (PAPRs) and 3M half-face air purifying respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1020
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- May 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: A) Worksite - On or about March 8, 2016, shop fabricators who were wearing Miller PAPRs and 3M half-face APRs had never been provided with medical evaluations to ensure that the act of wearing the respirators would not expose the employees to hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- May 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: A) Worksite - On or about March 8, 2016, employees who wore powered air purifying respirators and half-face respirators were not provided with basic information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of the Respiratory Protection standard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: A) Worksite - On or about March 8, 2016, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program to address the hazards of chemicals such as but not limited to: welding rod, flux, stainless steel, and phosphoric acid (Surfox-T).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1020
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- May 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 23, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: A) Worksite - On or about March 8, 2016, the employer did not train employees on the hazards of materials such as but not limited to: welding rod, flux, stainless steel, and phosphoric acid (Surfox-T).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1026 D01
- Issued
- May 31, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI): A) Worksite - On and prior to March 8, 2016, the employer did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI) while welding or grinding stainless steel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Modern Mechanical FAB, INC.
View Modern Mechanical FAB, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423510)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341308823.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.