TULSA, OK ·
OSHA Inspection: AMERIPUMP MANUFACTURING, LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of AMERIPUMP MANUFACTURING, LLC in 13759 E APACHE ST, TULSA, OK 74116 (NAICS 336120). OSHA activity number 341310779.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AMERIPUMP MANUFACTURING, LLC
- Site address
- 13759 E APACHE ST
- City
- TULSA
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 74116
- Mailing
- 13759 E APACHE ST, TULSA, OK 74116
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336120
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 23, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees operating under-slung hoists: On or about March 9, 2016, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to struck by hazards during the operation of under-slung hoists with the following deficiencies: a) Under-slung hoist 1 in the shop had a broken safety latch at the lifting hook. b) Under-slung hoist 2 in the shop was missing the safety latch at the lifting hook. c) Inspections were not conducted on under-slung hoists 1 and 2.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- May 23, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: The employer did not ensure point of operation guarding was in place to protect employees from having any part of their body in the danger zone during operation. a) This violation was observed on or about March 9, 2016, the end mill point of operation was not guarded exposing employees to the hazards of being caught in the machinery. b) This violation was observed on or about March 9, 2016, the guard around the belt of the end mill was not guarded exposing employees to the hazards of being caught in the machinery. c) This violation was observed on or about March 9, 2016, the iron worker punch point of operation was not guarded exposing employees to the hazards of being caught in the machinery. d) This violation was observed on or about March 9, 2016, the drill press point of operation was not guarded exposing employees to the hazards of being caught in the machinery.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- May 23, 2016
- Abate by
- May 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: On or about March 9, 2016, the employer did not ensure the workrest on both sides of the grinder was adjusted to within one-eighth inch of the grinding wheel exposing employees to hazards associated with wheel breakage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- May 23, 2016
- Abate by
- May 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: On or about March 9, 2016, the employer did not ensure the tongue guard on both sides of the grinder was adjusted to within one-fourth inch of the grinding wheel exposing employees to hazards associated with wheel breakage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.215 D03
- Issued
- May 23, 2016
- Abate by
- May 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(d)(3): The contact surface(s) of wheel(s), blotter(s) or flange(s) on grinding machine(s) were not flat and free or foreign matter: On or about February 17, 2016, the employer did not ensure the surface of the wheel was maintained flat exposing employees to hazards associated with wheel breakage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.242 B
- Issued
- May 23, 2016
- Abate by
- May 27, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.: On or about March 9, 2016, the employer allowed employees to use air above 30 psi to clean parts, exposing employees to hazards associated with being struck-by dust and debris.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.243 B02
- Issued
- May 23, 2016
- Abate by
- May 27, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.243(b)(2): Air hose and hose connections used for conducting compressed air to utilization equipment was not designed for the pressure and service to which they were subjected: On or about March 9, 2016, employees were allowed to use pneumatic tools that were attached to an air hose that had radiator style clamps attaching the air hose to the air nozzle. Employees were exposed to hazards associated with being struck by the air hose should the clamp fail.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.254 D09 III
- Issued
- May 23, 2016
- Abate by
- May 27, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.254(d)(9)(iii): Cables with damaged insulation or exposed bare conductors were not replaced: On or about March 9, 2016, the employer allowed employees to use extension cords with damaged insulation exposing employees to hazards associated with electric shock.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.334 A02 II
- Issued
- May 23, 2016
- Abate by
- May 27, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(ii): There was a defect or evidence of damage that could have exposed an employee to injury and the defective or damaged item was not removed from service: On or about March 9, 2016, the employer allowed damaged flexible cords to be used throughout the facility exposing employees to hazards associated with electric shock.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 23, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about March 9, 2016, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program exposing employees to hazards associated with contact with hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- May 23, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about March 9, 2016, the employer did not provide employees with information and training for hazardous chemicals used in the work area exposing employees to hazards associated with contact with hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- May 23, 2016
- Abate by
- May 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries: On or about March 9, 2016, the employer did not ensure each fire extinguisher provided for employee use was accessible exposing employees to hazards associated with fire.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- May 23, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: On or about March 9, 2016, the employer did not ensure fire extinguishers in the facility were inspected on an annual basis exposing employees to hazards associated with fire.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336120)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341310779.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.